Hamelin Anne-Marie, Mercier Céline, Bédard Annie
Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l'Agriculture, Québec City, Canada G1V 0A6.
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Dec;11(12):1389-96. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003406. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
The aim of the study was (i) to describe the needs of food-insecure households and their assessment of community programmes, as expressed by households and perceived by stakeholders; and (ii) to examine the similarities and differences between households' and stakeholders' perceptions in Quebec City area.
DESIGN/SETTING/SUBJECTS: A semi-structured interview and sociodemographic questionnaire with fifty-five households and fifty-nine stakeholders (community workers, managers, donor agencies). The transcriptions were subjected to content analysis and inter-coder reliability measurement.
The respondents' perceptions converge towards three main categories of needs: needs specific to food security, conditions necessary for achieving food security and related needs. There was agreement on the necessity of better financial resources, although the impact of financial resources alone may be uncertain in the opinion of some stakeholders. Different perceptions of needs and of their fulfilment by community programmes emerge between both groups. Despite households found positive aspects, they complained that quality of food and access were major needs neglected. Their account suggests overall a partial fit between the programmes and food security needs; even a combination of programmes (e.g. collective kitchens, purchasing groups, community gardens) was insufficient to adequately meet these needs. In contrast, most stakeholders perceived that the household's primary need was a basic amount of food and that the households were satisfied with programmes.
It is urgent to evaluate the overall effect of community programmes on specific aspects of household food insecurity. The results emphasise that community programmes alone cannot bring about social change needed to prevent food insecurity.
本研究的目的是:(i)描述粮食不安全家庭的需求以及他们对社区项目的评估,这些评估由家庭表达并由利益相关者感知;(ii)研究魁北克市地区家庭与利益相关者认知之间的异同。
设计/背景/对象:对55个家庭和59名利益相关者(社区工作者、管理人员、捐助机构)进行半结构化访谈并填写社会人口统计学问卷。对访谈记录进行内容分析和编码员间信度测量。
受访者的认知集中在三大类需求上:粮食安全特有的需求、实现粮食安全所需的条件以及相关需求。大家一致认为需要更好的财政资源,不过一些利益相关者认为仅靠财政资源的影响可能并不确定。两组对需求以及社区项目满足需求的情况有不同认知。尽管家庭发现了积极方面,但他们抱怨食品质量和获取渠道是被忽视的主要需求。他们的说法总体表明项目与粮食安全需求部分契合;即使是多种项目(如集体厨房、采购团体、社区菜园)的组合也不足以充分满足这些需求。相比之下,大多数利益相关者认为家庭的主要需求是基本数量的食物,并且家庭对项目感到满意。
迫切需要评估社区项目对家庭粮食不安全具体方面的总体影响。结果强调仅靠社区项目无法带来预防粮食不安全所需的社会变革。