Myers Catherine E, Hopkins Ramona O, DeLuca John, Moore Nancy B, Wolansky Leo J, Sumner Jennifer M, Gluck Mark A
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Neuropsychology. 2008 Sep;22(5):681-6. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.681.
Human anterograde amnesia can result from a variety of etiologies, including hypoxic brain injury and anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm rupture. Although each etiology can cause a similarly severe disruption in declarative memory for verbal and visual material, there may be differences in incrementally acquired, feedback-based learning, as well as generalization. Here, 6 individuals who survived hypoxic brain injury, 7 individuals who survived ACoA aneurysm rupture, and 13 matched controls were tested on 2 tasks that included a feedback-based learning phase followed by a transfer phase in which familiar information is presented in new ways. In both tasks, the ACoA group was slow on initial learning, but those patients who completed the learning phase went on to transfer as well as controls. In the hypoxic group, 1 patient failed to complete either task; the remaining hypoxic group did not differ from controls during learning of either task, but was impaired on transfer. These results highlight a difference in feedback-based learning in 2 amnesic etiologies, despite similar levels of declarative memory impairment.
人类顺行性遗忘可由多种病因引起,包括缺氧性脑损伤和前交通动脉(ACoA)动脉瘤破裂。尽管每种病因都可能导致对言语和视觉材料的陈述性记忆出现类似严重的破坏,但在渐进性获得的、基于反馈的学习以及泛化方面可能存在差异。在此,对6名缺氧性脑损伤幸存者、7名ACoA动脉瘤破裂幸存者以及13名匹配的对照组进行了两项任务测试,这两项任务包括一个基于反馈的学习阶段,随后是一个迁移阶段,在该阶段中以新的方式呈现熟悉的信息。在两项任务中,ACoA组在初始学习时速度较慢,但那些完成学习阶段的患者在迁移方面与对照组表现相当。在缺氧组中,1名患者未能完成任何一项任务;其余缺氧组在两项任务的学习过程中与对照组没有差异,但在迁移方面受损。这些结果凸显了两种失忆病因在基于反馈的学习方面的差异,尽管陈述性记忆损伤程度相似。