Adams Harold P, Leira Enrique C, Torner James C, Barnathan Elliot, Padgett Lakshmi, Effron Mark B, Hacke Werner
Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Stroke. 2008 Dec;39(12):3277-82. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508853. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with a new stroke have symptoms present on awakening (wake-up stroke), but these persons are not treated with interventions to restore perfusion because the time of onset is not known. We elected to test the safety and possible efficacy of abciximab in treatment of enrolled subjects with wake-up stroke.
Abciximab in Emergency Stroke Treatment Trial-II (AbESTT-II) tested the usefulness of abciximab in improving outcomes after acute ischemic stroke and it prospectively tested an intervention in subjects that awakened with their stroke. We compared the outcomes among the subjects in the wake-up group with the other subjects in the trial.
Of the 801 subjects randomized in the trial, 43 (22 abciximab and 21 placebo) had wake-up strokes. Those with wake-up strokes had similar baseline characteristics as the other subjects except for a higher rate of a new stroke found on CT. Recruitment of patients into the wake-up group was halted early because of the rate of bleeding with abciximab exceeded the prespecified safety margins (3 of 22 [13.6%]) within 5 days or at discharge versus 15 of 375 (4.0%) for the nonwake-up group (P=0.07). Favorable outcomes at 3 months, as defined by scores on the modified Rankin Scale, among the wake-up group (4 of 43 [9.3%]) were worse than the nonwake-up group (221 of 758 [29.2%]; P=0.005).
Although the baseline characteristics of the wake-up group of subjects were similar to those of persons enrolled in the nonwake-up group, their outcomes were much poorer. Patients with wake-up stroke may not tolerate reperfusion therapies even when started within a short time of awakening.
约10%至20%的新发卒中患者在醒来时即出现症状(醒后卒中),但由于发病时间不明,这些患者未接受恢复灌注的干预治疗。我们选择测试阿昔单抗治疗入选的醒后卒中患者的安全性及可能的疗效。
阿昔单抗治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效试验-II(AbESTT-II)测试了阿昔单抗改善急性缺血性卒中后转归的有效性,并前瞻性地测试了对卒中后醒来的受试者的干预措施。我们将醒后组受试者的转归与试验中的其他受试者进行了比较。
在该试验随机分组的801例受试者中,43例(22例接受阿昔单抗治疗,21例接受安慰剂治疗)为醒后卒中。醒后卒中患者与其他受试者的基线特征相似,但CT显示新发卒中的发生率较高。由于阿昔单抗治疗组的出血率在5天内或出院时超过了预先设定的安全界限(22例中有3例[13.6%]),而非醒后组为375例中的15例(4.0%)(P=0.07),因此提前停止了将患者纳入醒后组。根据改良Rankin量表评分定义,醒后组3个月时的良好转归(43例中有4例[9.3%])比非醒后组(758例中有221例[29.2%];P=0.005)差。
尽管醒后组受试者的基线特征与非醒后组受试者相似,但其转归要差得多。醒后卒中患者即使在醒来后短时间内开始接受再灌注治疗,也可能无法耐受。