[自体髂嵴后路腰椎椎间融合术或椎间融合器治疗下腰椎不稳的对比研究]

[Instability of lower lumbar treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest or interbody fusion cage: a comparative study].

作者信息

Wang Rongmao, Lin Xiang, Shi Shupei, Xiu Zhongbiao, Guo Yuanbing

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Fujian Province, Fuzhou Fujian, 350004, PR China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;22(8):928-32.

DOI:
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the curative effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest to that of interbody fusion cage for adult instability of lower lumbar.

METHODS

From February 2003 to October 2006, 60 inpatients with lower lumbar instability were treated. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: bone-graft group (n=28) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two autologous iliac crests, while cage group (n=32) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two quadrate cages. In the bone-graft group, 17 males and 11 females aged (52.78 +/- 10.50) years with 3-16 months of disease course, there were 12 cases of degenerative instability, 14 isthmus slit olisthe and 2 iatrogenic instability, including 1 case of L3,4, 17 cases of L4,5 and 10 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (23.24 +/- 6.62) mm, disc space activity was (10.50 +/- 5.07)degrees, sagittal saw slippage distance was (4.50 +/- 1.15) mm and the JOA score was 18.56 +/- 2.68. In the cage group, 19 males and 13 females aged (51.75 +/- 10.44) years with 3.5-14.0 months of disease course, there were 16 cases of degenerative instability, 14 isthmus slit olisthe and 2 iatrogenic instability, including 16 cases of L4,5 and 16 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (24.34 +/- 7.22) mm, disc space activity was (11.12 +/- 5.67)degrees, sagittal saw slippage distance was (4.38 +/- 0.75) mm and the JOA score was 19.00 +/- 4.12. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, JOA score, disc space activity and relative disc space height preoperatively (P > 0.05).

RESULTS

All patients received the follow-up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month postoperatively. There was no significant difference in operation time and hemorrhage amount between the two groups (P > 0.05), but significant difference in the cost of operation (P < 0.01). Two cases in the bone-graft group suffered donor site pain and received no treatment. Three cases in the bone-graft group and 2 cases in the cage group had symptom of nerve injury 1-2 days after surgery, which were cured after expectant treatment. There were no pseudoarticulation formation, intervertebral space infection and cage aversion in both groups. Significant difference of relative disc space height was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P < 0.01) and significant differences were evident between the two groups at any of the time points (P < 0.01). One month after operation, there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was also significant difference at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after operation (P < 0.01). No sign of fusion was found in each group at the 1st and 3rd month after operation. In bone-graft group, there were 7 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 23 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. In cage group, there were 8 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 29 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the rate of fusion at 6 and 12 months follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significant difference of JOA scores was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P < 0.05). And no significant difference in JOA scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up was evident between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference between the two groups in the fusion time, the fusion rate and the clinical symptoms alleviation, indicating autologous iliac crest is applicable to interbody fusion for the treatment of adult instability of lower lumbar and good therapeutic effect can be achieved with no immunoreaction and lower cost.

摘要

目的

比较后路腰椎椎间融合术联合自体髂嵴植骨与椎间融合器治疗成人下腰椎不稳的疗效。

方法

选取2003年2月至2006年10月收治的60例下腰椎不稳患者。将患者随机分为2组:植骨组(n = 28)采用后路腰椎椎间融合术联合两块自体髂嵴植骨治疗,融合器组(n = 32)采用后路腰椎椎间融合术联合两个方形融合器治疗。植骨组中,男17例,女11例,年龄(52.78±10.50)岁,病程3 - 16个月,其中退行性不稳12例,峡部裂滑脱14例,医源性不稳2例,包括L3、4节段1例,L4、5节段17例,L5、S1节段10例。相对椎间隙高度为(23.24±6.62)mm,椎间隙活动度为(10.50±5.07)°,矢状面滑脱距离为(4.50±1.15)mm,JOA评分为18.56±2.68。融合器组中,男19例,女13例,年龄(51.75±10.44)岁,病程3.5 - 14.0个月,其中退行性不稳16例,峡部裂滑脱14例,医源性不稳2例,包括L4、5节段16例,L5、S1节段16例。相对椎间隙高度为(24.34±7.22)mm,椎间隙活动度为(11.12±5.67)°,矢状面滑脱距离为(4.38±0.75)mm,JOA评分为19.00±4.12。两组患者术前在年龄、性别、JOA评分、椎间隙活动度及相对椎间隙高度方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

所有患者均于术后1、3、6及12个月进行随访。两组患者手术时间和出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但手术费用差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。植骨组有2例出现供区疼痛,未进行处理。植骨组3例和融合器组2例患者术后1 - 2天出现神经损伤症状,经保守治疗后治愈。两组均未出现假关节形成、椎间隙感染及融合器移位。两组患者术前及术后各时间点相对椎间隙高度差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且两组在任何时间点比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后1个月,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3、6及12个月差异也有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后1及3个月两组均未发现融合迹象。植骨组术后6个月有7例椎体融合,术后12个月有23例椎体融合。融合器组术后6个月有8例椎体融合,术后12个月有29例椎体融合。两组6个月及12个月随访时融合率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术前及术后JOA评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后1、3、6及12个月随访时JOA评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

两组在融合时间、融合率及临床症状缓解方面差异无统计学意义,表明自体髂嵴适用于椎间融合治疗成人下腰椎不稳,可取得良好疗效,无免疫反应且费用较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索