Dierks Ulf, Hoffmann Reimer, Meek Marcel F
Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Oldenburg, Germany.
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2008 Sep;12(3):183-7. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e31817f289a.
A prospective randomized trial for release of the first annular pulley (A-1 pulley) in trigger fingers with a percutaneous technique versus the open surgical technique is presented. Thirty-six patients were randomized to either open (n = 16) or percutaneous (#15 blade; n = 20) release of the A-1 pulley. All patients were evaluated for grip strength, active range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint, and residual pain at 1 and 12 weeks after release. Furthermore, the operation time was assessed, and the costs were calculated. Overall, 100% success in terms of grip strength, active range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint, and residual pain was obtained in both groups. Mean operation time was significantly longer with the open technique. Because of lower costs and quicker procedure with equal functional outcome when compared with open surgery, we recommend the percutaneous technique using a #15 blade for trigger finger release.
本文介绍了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较经皮技术与开放手术技术松解扳机指第一环状滑车(A-1滑车)的效果。36例患者被随机分为开放手术组(n = 16)和经皮技术组(使用15号刀片;n = 20)松解A-1滑车。对所有患者在松解后1周和12周时进行握力、近端指间关节主动活动范围及残余疼痛的评估。此外,评估手术时间并计算费用。总体而言,两组在握力、近端指间关节主动活动范围及残余疼痛方面均获得100%的成功。开放技术的平均手术时间明显更长。与开放手术相比,经皮技术成本更低、操作更快且功能结果相同,因此我们推荐使用15号刀片的经皮技术来松解扳机指。