Bonett Douglas G
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Psychol Methods. 2008 Sep;13(3):173-81. doi: 10.1037/a0012868.
The currently available meta-analytic methods for correlations have restrictive assumptions. The fixed-effects methods assume equal population correlations and exhibit poor performance under correlation heterogeneity. The random-effects methods do not assume correlation homogeneity but are based on an equally unrealistic assumption that the selected studies are a random sample from a well-defined superpopulation of study populations. The random-effects methods can accommodate correlation heterogeneity, but these methods do not perform properly in typical applications where the studies are nonrandomly selected. A new fixed-effects meta-analytic confidence interval for bivariate correlations is proposed that is easy to compute and performs well under correlation heterogeneity and nonrandomly selected studies.
目前可用的相关性元分析方法具有限制性假设。固定效应方法假设总体相关性相等,并且在相关性异质性情况下表现不佳。随机效应方法不假设相关性同质性,但基于一个同样不切实际的假设,即所选研究是来自定义明确的研究总体超总体的随机样本。随机效应方法可以适应相关性异质性,但在研究是非随机选择的典型应用中,这些方法表现不佳。本文提出了一种新的双变量相关性固定效应元分析置信区间,该区间易于计算,并且在相关性异质性和非随机选择研究的情况下表现良好。