Suppr超能文献

亚洲生产的促红细胞生成素产品与安进公司生产的美国促红细胞生成素α的生化评估。

Biochemical assessment of erythropoietin products from Asia versus US Epoetin alfa manufactured by Amgen.

作者信息

Park Sungae S, Park Jihea, Ko Jason, Chen Louise, Meriage David, Crouse-Zeineddini Jill, Wong Wendy, Kerwin Bruce A

机构信息

Amgen Inc., Process and Product Development, Formulation and Analytical Resources Group, Thousand Oaks, California 91320, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 2009 May;98(5):1688-99. doi: 10.1002/jps.21546.

Abstract

We compared the physical and chemical properties of purported copies of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) purchased from Korea, China, and India with the innovator product, Epoetin alfa, manufactured by Amgen Inc. The products were characterized for similarity in the types of glycoforms present, the relative degree of unfolding, in vitro potency, presence of covalent aggregates, and presence of cleavage products using established analytical methods. All products were different from Epoetin alfa (Epogen). The purported copies of rHuEPO from Korea, India, and China contained more glycoforms and other impurities. The in vitro relative potency varied for each product when based on the labeled concentration, while the concentration based on ELISA analysis brought the relative potency, for most products closer to 100%. These data emphasize potential biochemical discrepancies resulting from different cell lines and manufacturing processes. Concentrations varied within products and did not always match the information provided on the product label. As it is not possible to reliably correlate such biochemical discrepancies to clinical consequences, or the lack thereof, these data support the need for extensive preclinical testing and clinical testing of all investigational products as not all safety and efficacy aspects can be assessed during preclinical evaluation.

摘要

我们将从韩国、中国和印度购买的所谓重组人促红细胞生成素(rHuEPO)仿制品的物理和化学性质与安进公司生产的创新产品阿法依泊汀进行了比较。使用既定的分析方法,对这些产品的糖型种类、相对解折叠程度、体外效价、共价聚集体的存在以及裂解产物的存在等方面的相似性进行了表征。所有产品均与阿法依泊汀(益比奥)不同。来自韩国、印度和中国的所谓rHuEPO仿制品含有更多的糖型和其他杂质。基于标记浓度时,每种产品的体外相对效价各不相同,而基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析的浓度使大多数产品的相对效价更接近100%。这些数据强调了不同细胞系和生产工艺导致的潜在生化差异。产品内的浓度各不相同,且并不总是与产品标签上提供的信息相符。由于无法将此类生化差异可靠地与临床后果或其缺失相关联,这些数据支持对所有研究产品进行广泛的临床前测试和临床试验的必要性,因为并非所有安全和有效性方面都能在临床前评估期间进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验