Seroka Cheryl D, Johnson Cynthia E, Heideman Paul D
Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA.
J Circadian Rhythms. 2008 Sep 9;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1740-3391-6-8.
Variation in circadian rhythms and nocturnality may, hypothetically, be related to or independent of genetic variation in photoperiodic mediation of seasonal changes in physiology and behavior. We hypothesized that strain variation in photoperiodism between photoperiodic F344 rats and nonphotoperiodic Harlan Sprague Dawley (HSD) rats might be caused by underlying variation in clock function. We predicted that HSD rats would have more activity during the day or subjective day, longer free-running rhythms, poor entrainment to short day length, and shorter duration of activity, traits that have been associated with nonphotoperiodism in other laboratory rodent species, relative to F344 rats. An alternative hypothesis, that differences are due to variation in melatonin secretion or responses to melatonin, predicts either no such differences or inconsistent combinations of differences.
We tested these predictions by examining activity rhythms of young male F344 and HSD rats given access to running wheels in constant dark (DD), short day length (L8:D16; SD), and long day length (L16:D8; LD). We compared nocturnality (the proportion of activity during night or subjective night), duration of activity (alpha), activity onset and offset, phase angle of entrainment, and free running rhythms (tau) of F344 and HSD rats.
HSD rats had significantly greater activity during the day, were sometimes arrhythmic in DD, and had significantly longer tau than F344 rats, consistent with predictions. However, HSD rats had significantly longer alpha than F344 rats and both strains entrained to SD, inconsistent with predictions.
The ability of HSD rats to entrain to SD, combined with longer alpha than F344 rats, suggests that the circadian system of HSD rats responds correctly to SD. These data offer best support for the alternative hypothesis, that differences in photoresponsiveness between F344 and HSD rats are caused by non-circadian differences in melatonin secretion or the response to melatonin.
昼夜节律的变化和夜行性,从理论上讲,可能与生理和行为季节性变化的光周期调节中的基因变异有关,也可能与之无关。我们假设光周期F344大鼠和非光周期哈兰·斯普拉格·道利(HSD)大鼠之间光周期现象的品系差异可能是由生物钟功能的潜在差异引起的。我们预测,相对于F344大鼠,HSD大鼠在白天或主观白天会有更多活动,自由运行节律更长,对短日照的同步能力较差,活动持续时间更短,这些特征在其他实验室啮齿动物物种中与非光周期现象相关。另一种假设是,差异是由于褪黑素分泌或对褪黑素的反应的变化所致,这一假设预测不会有此类差异,或者差异组合不一致。
我们通过检查在持续黑暗(DD)、短日照(L8:D16;SD)和长日照(L16:D8;LD)条件下可以使用跑步轮的年轻雄性F344和HSD大鼠的活动节律,来检验这些预测。我们比较了F344和HSD大鼠的夜行性(夜间或主观夜间活动的比例)、活动持续时间(α)、活动开始和结束时间、同步相位角以及自由运行节律(τ)。
HSD大鼠在白天的活动明显更多,在DD条件下有时无节律,并且其τ明显长于F344大鼠,这与预测一致。然而,HSD大鼠的α明显长于F344大鼠,并且两个品系都能与SD同步,这与预测不一致。
HSD大鼠与SD同步的能力,以及其α长于F344大鼠,表明HSD大鼠的昼夜节律系统对SD有正确反应。这些数据为另一种假设提供了最佳支持,即F344和HSD大鼠之间光反应性的差异是由褪黑素分泌或对褪黑素的反应的非昼夜差异引起的。