McDavid Sarah, Verdier Dorly, Lund James P, Kolta Arlette
Groupe de recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central du FRSQ, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Sep;28(6):1136-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06413.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
The trigeminal motor nucleus contains the somata of motoneurons innervating the jaw muscles, but also those of interneurons that we have characterized morphologically and immunohistochemically previously. Here we compare their basic physiological characteristics and synaptic inputs from the peri-trigeminal area (PeriV) to those of motoneurons using whole-cell recordings made with pipettes containing biocytin in brainstem slices of rats that had a tracer injected into their masseters. Values for input resistance, spike duration and overall duration of afterhyperpolarization (AHP) were greater for interneurons than for motoneurons. Some interneurons (44%) and motoneurons (33%) had an outward rectification during depolarization. Hyperpolarization-induced inward rectification was seen predominantly in interneurons (85% vs. 31% for motoneurons). Few interneurons (15%) showed depolarization and time-dependent firing frequency accommodation, while half (52%) of the motoneurons did. Rebound excitation at the offset of hyperpolarization was more common in interneurons than in motoneurons (62% vs. 34%). Both populations received synaptic inputs from PeriV. These inputs were predominantly excitatory and were mediated by non-N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamatergic receptors. Response latencies and rise times of the evoked potentials were longer in interneurons than in motoneurons, suggesting that some of the inputs to interneurons could be polysynaptic and/or occurring at distal dendritic locations. Miniature synaptic events could be seen in about half of the neurons in both populations. These results suggest that interneurons can be clearly distinguished from motoneurons on the basis of some electrophysiological properties like the input resistance and spike and AHP durations, and the kinetics of their synaptic inputs from adjacent areas.
三叉神经运动核包含支配咀嚼肌的运动神经元的胞体,也包含我们之前已通过形态学和免疫组织化学方法鉴定的中间神经元的胞体。在此,我们使用含有生物胞素的移液管在将示踪剂注入咬肌的大鼠脑干切片中进行全细胞记录,比较它们的基本生理特征以及来自三叉神经周围区域(PeriV)的突触输入与运动神经元的差异。中间神经元的输入电阻、动作电位持续时间和超极化后电位(AHP)的总持续时间的值均大于运动神经元。一些中间神经元(44%)和运动神经元(33%)在去极化过程中表现出外向整流。超极化诱导的内向整流主要见于中间神经元(85%,而运动神经元为31%)。很少有中间神经元(15%)表现出去极化和时间依赖性放电频率适应性,而一半(52%)的运动神经元有此表现。超极化结束时的反弹兴奋在中间神经元中比在运动神经元中更常见(62%对34%)。这两类神经元均接受来自PeriV的突触输入。这些输入主要是兴奋性的,由非N - 甲基 - D - 天冬氨酸谷氨酸能受体介导。中间神经元中诱发电位的反应潜伏期和上升时间比运动神经元更长,这表明中间神经元的一些输入可能是多突触的和/或发生在远端树突位置。在这两类神经元中,约一半的神经元可观察到微小突触事件。这些结果表明,基于一些电生理特性,如输入电阻、动作电位和AHP持续时间以及来自相邻区域的突触输入动力学,中间神经元可与运动神经元明显区分开来。