Behrens Katharina, Calliess Iris Tatjana
Klinikum Region Hannover (Wunstorf), Abteilung für Allgemeinpsychiatrie.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2008 Dec;76(12):725-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038251. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
Given an increased knowledge for the special requirements of patients with a history of migration in mental health care, different approaches varying between an adaptation of existing systems and the implementation of specialized institutions are being discussed. The present study investigates the treatment courses of 55 first generation immigrants and a control sample of 55 native patients treated in a psychiatric day clinic of a university clinic. Besides the application of questionnaires concerning treatment outcome, a detailed content analysis of treatment records was performed investigating the preference for different therapeutic approaches, migration- and culture-related aspects as well as language problems. Treatment outcome and the reactions to different therapeutic strategies (i. e., verbal-oriented vs. body-centered approaches) suggest a good fit of a common treatment concept also for patients from different countries of origin and ethnic backgrounds. Qualitative analyses, however, imply that migration biography and cultural diversity should be included in diagnostic and therapeutic considerations to a much bigger extent. Language problems, in contrast, appeared to be less salient in the present study.
鉴于对有移民史患者在精神卫生保健方面特殊需求的认识不断提高,人们正在讨论各种不同的方法,这些方法在对现有系统的调整和专门机构的设立之间各不相同。本研究调查了在大学诊所的精神科日间门诊接受治疗的55名第一代移民以及55名本地患者对照样本的治疗过程。除了应用有关治疗结果的问卷外,还对治疗记录进行了详细的内容分析,调查了对不同治疗方法的偏好、与移民和文化相关的方面以及语言问题。治疗结果以及对不同治疗策略(即以言语为导向的方法与以身体为中心的方法)的反应表明,对于来自不同原籍国和种族背景的患者,一种通用的治疗理念也很适用。然而,定性分析表明,移民经历和文化多样性应在更大程度上纳入诊断和治疗的考虑因素中。相比之下,语言问题在本研究中似乎不太突出。