Arts Josje H E, Muijser Hans, Kuper C Frieke, Woutersen Ruud A
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, TNO Quality of Life, P.O. Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;52(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
The paper aims to evaluate the indoor air limit of 1 microg/m(3) (0.8 ppb) formaldehyde as advised by the European Commission [the INDEX project; Kotzias, D., Koistinen, K., Kephalopoulos, S., Schlitt, C., Carrer, P., Maroni, M., Jantunen, M., Cochet, C., Kirchner, S., Lindvall, T., McLaughlin, J., Mølhave, L., de Oliveira Fernandes, E., Seifert, B., 2005. Critical appraisal of the setting and implementation of indoor exposure limits in the EU. European Commission, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Physical and Chemical Exposure Unit, Ispra, Italy, pp. 1-50]. The limit has been based on a nose and throat irritation threshold of 0.1mg/m(3) (0.08 ppm; LOAEL), a NOAEL of 0.03 mg/m(3) (0.025 ppm) and an assessment factor of 30, including a factor of 3 for the higher sensitivity of children. Nose and throat irritation, at concentrations below which hyperplasia/metaplasia occurs, are most likely the manifestation of trigeminal nerve stimulation (sensory irritation). The threshold for sensory irritation in human volunteers is 1 ppm, much higher than the 0.1mg/m(3) indicated above. Eye irritation is the most sensitive effect reported in human volunteers but has been mentioned only occasionally in the studies used by the European Commission. Moreover, sensory irritation is a local reaction that requires a low assessment factor, if any. It is difficult to judge the sensitivity for sensory irritation in children because of the potential confounding factors in the evaluated studies. It is concluded that an indoor air level of 0.1 ppm (0.12 mg/m(3)) formaldehyde, as indicated by Appel et al. (2006) [Appel, K.E., Bernauer, U., Herbst, U., Madle, S., Schulte, A., Richter-Reichhelm, H.B., Gundert-Remy, U. 2006. Kann für Formaldehyd eine "sichere" Konzentration abgeleitet werden?--Analyse der Daten zur krebserzeugenden Wirkung (Can a "safe" concentration be established for formaldehyde?--Analysis of carcinogenicity data)? Umweltmed. Forsch. Prax. 11, 347-361], can be considered a safe and appropriate level.
本文旨在评估欧盟委员会建议的室内空气中甲醛浓度限值1微克/立方米(0.8 ppb)[INDEX项目;Kotzias, D., Koistinen, K., Kephalopoulos, S., Schlitt, C., Carrer, P., Maroni, M., Jantunen, M., Cochet, C., Kirchner, S., Lindvall, T., McLaughlin, J., Mølhave, L., de Oliveira Fernandes, E., Seifert, B., 2005年。对欧盟室内接触限值的设定和实施的批判性评估。欧盟委员会,健康与消费者保护研究所,物理和化学接触部门,意大利伊斯普拉,第1 - 50页]。该限值基于0.1毫克/立方米(0.08 ppm;最低观察到有害作用水平)的鼻喉刺激阈值、0.03毫克/立方米(0.025 ppm)的未观察到有害作用水平以及30的评估系数,其中包括因儿童更高敏感性而设定的3倍系数。鼻喉刺激(低于该浓度会发生增生/化生)很可能是三叉神经刺激(感觉刺激)的表现。人类志愿者中感觉刺激的阈值为1 ppm,远高于上述提到的0.1毫克/立方米。眼睛刺激是人类志愿者中报告的最敏感效应,但在欧盟委员会所使用的研究中仅偶尔被提及。此外,感觉刺激是一种局部反应,如果需要评估的话,所需的评估系数较低。由于评估研究中存在潜在的混杂因素,很难判断儿童对感觉刺激的敏感性。结论是,如Appel等人(2006年)[Appel, K.E., Bernauer, U., Herbst, U., Madle, S., Schulte, A., Richter-Reichhelm, H.B., Gundert-Remy, U. 2006年。甲醛能否推导出一个“安全”浓度?——致癌作用数据分析(Can a "safe" concentration be established for formaldehyde?--Analysis of carcinogenicity data)?环境医学研究实践11, 347 - 361]所指出的,室内空气中甲醛浓度0.1 ppm(0.12毫克/立方米)可被视为一个安全且合适的水平。