Bacher Michael, Depboylu Candan, Du Yansheng, Noelker Carmen, Oertel Wolfgang H, Behr Thomas, Henriksen Gjermund, Behe Martin, Dodel Richard
Department of Neurology, Philipps University, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jan 16;449(3):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.083. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
Active as well as passive immunization against beta-amlyoid (Abeta) has been proposed as a treatment to lower cerebral amyloid burden and stabilize cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). To clarify the mechanism of action underlying passive immunization, the in vivo distribution (and sites of degradation) of peripherally administered radiolabeled human and mouse anti-Abeta antibodies were analyzed in a transgenic mouse model of AD. In APP23 mice, a model in which mutated human amyloid precursor protein is overexpressed, the biodistribution of intravenously applicated (111)indium-conjugated affinity-purified human polyclonal autoantibodies (NAbs-Abeta) was compared to that of monoclonal anti-Abeta(1-17) (6E10), anti-Abeta(17-24) antibodies (4G8) and anti-CD-20 (Rituximab), a non-Abeta targeting control. Blood clearance half-lives were 50+/-6h for Rituximab, 20-30h for NAbs-Abeta, 29+/-5h for 4G8 and 27+/-3h for 6E10. Blood activity was higher for 6E10 at 4h as compared to 4G8, Rituximab and NAbs-Abeta. At the 96h time point, Rituximab had the highest blood activity among the antibodies tested. As expected, all antibodies displayed hepatobiliary clearance. Additionally, NAbs-Abeta was excreted in the urinary tract. Liver and kidney uptake of NAbs-Abeta increased over time and was higher than in the monoclonal antibodies at 48h/96h. The brain-to-blood radioactivity ratio for NAbs-Abeta at later time points (>48h) was higher than that of 6E10, 4G8 and Rituximab. In addition, the distribution varied, with highest values found in the hippocampus. Our data indicate a cerebral accumulation of human NAbs-Abeta in the APP23 model. Further studies with human immunoglobulins and particularly with those that recognize different Abeta-epitopes are required in order to delineate in more detail the mode of action of NAbs-Abeta.
针对β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)的主动免疫和被动免疫均被提议作为降低阿尔茨海默病(AD)脑淀粉样蛋白负荷并稳定认知衰退的一种治疗方法。为阐明被动免疫的作用机制,在AD转基因小鼠模型中分析了外周给予的放射性标记的人源和鼠源抗Aβ抗体的体内分布(及降解部位)。在APP23小鼠(一种突变型人淀粉样前体蛋白过表达的模型)中,将静脉注射的(111)铟缀合的亲和纯化人多克隆自身抗体(NAbs-Aβ)的生物分布与单克隆抗Aβ(1-17)(6E10)、抗Aβ(17-24)抗体(4G8)以及非Aβ靶向对照抗CD-20(利妥昔单抗)的生物分布进行了比较。利妥昔单抗的血药清除半衰期为50±6小时,NAbs-Aβ为20 - 30小时,4G8为29±5小时,6E10为27±3小时。与4G8、利妥昔单抗和NAbs-Aβ相比,6E10在4小时时的血药活性更高。在96小时时间点,利妥昔单抗在所测试的抗体中血药活性最高。正如预期的那样,所有抗体均显示出肝胆清除。此外,NAbs-Aβ经尿路排泄。NAbs-Aβ在肝脏和肾脏的摄取随时间增加,在48小时/96小时时高于单克隆抗体。在后期时间点(>48小时),NAbs-Aβ的脑血放射性比值高于6E10、4G8和利妥昔单抗。此外,分布存在差异,在海马体中发现的值最高。我们的数据表明在APP23模型中人NAbs-Aβ在脑内有蓄积。需要对人免疫球蛋白,特别是那些识别不同Aβ表位的免疫球蛋白进行进一步研究,以便更详细地描述NAbs-Aβ的作用方式。