Wong Germaine, Howard Kirsten, Chapman Jeremy R, Craig Jonathan C
NHMRC Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Renal Medicine, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Nov;52(5):916-29. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
Breast cancer screening is recommended for women 50 years and older in most developed countries. Women on dialysis therapy have a risk of acquiring breast cancer similar to that for other women, but a greater all-cause mortality rate because of mortality from other competing causes. It is uncertain whether routine screening is cost-effective in women on dialysis therapy. In this study, we determine the costs and health outcomes of annual mammographic breast cancer screening in women on dialysis therapy.
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess uncertainties in the model's parameter estimates. BASE CASE: A cohort (n = 1,000) of women on dialysis therapy aged 50 to 69 years in Australia. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, AND TIME FRAME: A deterministic Markov model was developed from the perspective of a health care payer. Patients were followed up over their life time.
We compared a cohort of women who underwent annual mammography with a cohort that did not.
Life-years saved (LYS), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Average costs for a program of annual screening for a woman on dialysis therapy were $4,805 over 30 years. Incremental costs of screening were $403, and benefits were 0.0037 LYS. Five breast cancer deaths occurred in the screened arm and 6 breast cancer deaths occurred in the unscreened arm, a difference of 1 breast cancer averted by screening, with an estimated ICER of $109,852/LYS. The absolute reduction in breast cancer mortality was 0.1%, with a net gain in life expectancy of 1.3 days. The ICER was strongly dependent on age, with the most favorable ICER approximately $100,000/LYS at age 45 years.
Costs and clinical data were obtained from the nonindigenous Australian population and may not be generalizable to African Americans on dialysis therapy and indigenous populations from other countries.
Using the most optimistic assumptions, survival gains expected from screening for breast cancer in women on dialysis therapy are very small. Annual population breast cancer screening should not be recommended for all women on dialysis therapy, but should be an individual decision between the patient and health care provider.
在大多数发达国家,建议对50岁及以上的女性进行乳腺癌筛查。接受透析治疗的女性患乳腺癌的风险与其他女性相似,但由于其他竞争性病因导致的死亡率较高,其全因死亡率更高。目前尚不确定常规筛查对接受透析治疗的女性是否具有成本效益。在本研究中,我们确定了接受透析治疗的女性每年进行乳腺钼靶乳腺癌筛查的成本和健康结果。
我们进行了成本效益分析。进行了敏感性和情景分析,以评估模型参数估计中的不确定性。
澳大利亚1000名年龄在50至69岁之间接受透析治疗的女性队列。
模型、视角和时间框架:从医疗保健支付者的角度开发了一个确定性马尔可夫模型。对患者进行终身随访。
我们将一组接受年度乳腺钼靶检查的女性与一组未接受检查的女性进行了比较。
接受透析治疗的女性每年进行筛查计划的平均成本在30年内为4805美元。筛查的增量成本为403美元,收益为0.0037个生命年。筛查组发生了5例乳腺癌死亡,未筛查组发生了6例乳腺癌死亡,筛查避免了1例乳腺癌死亡,估计增量成本效益比为109852美元/生命年。乳腺癌死亡率的绝对降低为0.1%,预期寿命净增加1.3天。增量成本效益比强烈依赖于年龄,45岁时最有利的增量成本效益比约为100000美元/生命年。
成本和临床数据来自澳大利亚非原住民人群,可能不适用于接受透析治疗的非裔美国人和其他国家的原住民人群。
使用最乐观的假设,接受透析治疗的女性进行乳腺癌筛查预期的生存获益非常小。不应建议所有接受透析治疗的女性每年进行人群乳腺癌筛查,而应是患者和医疗保健提供者之间的个人决定。