• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据药品临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)审核结果估算日本临床试验的可靠性。

Reliability of Japanese clinical trials estimated from GCP audit findings.

作者信息

Saito K, Kodama Y, Ono S, Maida C, Fujimura A, Miyamoto E

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokuriku University, Ishikawa, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;46(8):415-20. doi: 10.5414/cpp46415.

DOI:10.5414/cpp46415
PMID:18793583
Abstract

To describe the reliability of Japanese clinical trials, we compared the results of a Good Clinical Practice (GCP) audit conducted between April 1997 and March 2000 (fiscal year (FY) 1997 - 1999) with those from April 2004 - March 2005 (FY2004). The number and proportion of various types of deficiencies described in GCP audit reports were compared between the 2 periods. The audit findings in the former period were based on official audits that covered 331 hospitals and 775 trials. The audits in the latter period targeted 114 hospitals and 189 trials. The inspection of former period was undertaken by the Organization for Pharmaceuticals Safety and Research (OPSR). On the other hand, the latter period was undertaken by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). The total number of deficiencies detected in GCP audits was 1,529 in the former 3-year period (FY1997 - 1999) and 819 in the latter period (FY2004). The total number of deficiencies detected and reported was more than 1.5-fold on an annual basis in the latter period. By category of deficiencies, the proportion of protocol deviations increased from 14.7 (225/1,529) to 45.7% (374/819), while the proportion of errors in case report forms (CRFs) decreased from 43.6 (666/ 1,529) to 27.1% (222/819). There were two remarkable changes in audit findings between FY1997 - 1999 and FY2004; the increase in the proportion of protocol deviations and the decrease in the proportion of CRF-related deficiencies. We think that in Japan the improvement of research environments is needed to provide reliable clinical data responsible for the regulatory standard of GCP.

摘要

为描述日本临床试验的可靠性,我们比较了1997年4月至2000年3月(1997 - 1999财年)与2004年4月至2005年3月(2004财年)期间进行的药物临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)审核结果。比较了两个时期GCP审核报告中描述的各类缺陷的数量和比例。前期的审核结果基于对331家医院和775项试验的官方审核。后期的审核针对114家医院和189项试验。前期的检查由药品安全研究组织(OPSR)进行。另一方面,后期由药品和医疗器械局(PMDA)进行。在前期3年期间(1997 - 1999财年)GCP审核中发现的缺陷总数为1529个,后期(2004财年)为819个。后期每年发现和报告的缺陷总数增加了1.5倍以上。按缺陷类别划分,方案偏离的比例从14.7%(225/1529)增至45.7%(374/819),而病例报告表(CRF)中的错误比例从43.6%(666/1529)降至27.1%(222/819)。在1997 - 1999财年和2004财年之间的审核结果有两个显著变化;方案偏离比例增加以及与CRF相关缺陷比例下降。我们认为在日本需要改善研究环境,以提供符合GCP监管标准的可靠临床数据。

相似文献

1
Reliability of Japanese clinical trials estimated from GCP audit findings.根据药品临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)审核结果估算日本临床试验的可靠性。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;46(8):415-20. doi: 10.5414/cpp46415.
2
Quality of Japanese clinical trials estimated from good clinical practice audit findings.根据良好临床实践审核结果评估的日本临床试验质量。
Am J Ther. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):127-33. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200603000-00008.
3
Recent changes in quality in Japanese clinical trials.日本临床试验质量的近期变化。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jan;38(1):151-5. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D155.
4
Current status of quality in Japanese clinical trials.日本临床试验的质量现状。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Aug;26(4):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.09.004.
5
The quality of conduct in Japanese clinical trials: deficiencies found in GCP inspections.日本临床试验中的行为质量:GCP检查中发现的缺陷
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Feb;23(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00182-9.
6
[In order to perform clinical trials efficiently in Japan--important issues in medical institutions raised by the GCP on-site review].[为在日本高效开展临床试验——GCP现场审查提出的医疗机构重要问题]
Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Aug;44(8):541-9.
7
Compliance with Good Clinical Practice in oncology registration trials in Japan.日本肿瘤注册临床试验中的良好临床实践依从性。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jun;22(6):1451-1456. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq594. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
8
[Performing clinical trials efficiently in Japan--independent clinical trials and GCP].在日本高效开展临床试验——独立临床试验与药物临床试验质量管理规范
Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2007 Jun;45(6):449-54.
9
GCP data quality for early clinical development.药物临床试验质量管理规范数据的早期临床开发质量。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1756-63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3267. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
10
[Public GCP unit--experiences from the Aarhus University Hospital].[公共药物临床试验规范单位——奥胡斯大学医院的经验]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1667-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Jcerity endoscoper airway and the endotracheal tube in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.经内镜食管静脉曲张结扎术中 Jcerity 内镜用气道与气管导管的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 22;13(1):11849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39086-6.
2
A descriptive research: Exclusion from submitted clinical data package in the review process of new drug approval due to GCP violation in Japan.一项描述性研究:在日本新药审批审查过程中,因违反《药物临床试验质量管理规范》而被排除在提交的临床数据包之外。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 19;15:100416. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100416. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Sevoflurane may be more beneficial than propofol in patients receiving endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy: A randomized, double-blind study.
在接受内镜下静脉曲张结扎术和内镜下静脉曲张硬化治疗的患者中,七氟醚可能比丙泊酚更有益:一项随机双盲研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Oct;14(4):3145-3152. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4919. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
Surveillance of protocol deviations in Japanese oncology registration trials: a single institute experience.日本肿瘤学注册试验中方案偏离的监测:单机构经验
Invest New Drugs. 2017 Jun;35(3):392-396. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0434-3. Epub 2017 Feb 1.