J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1989;10(11):456-62. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1989.10.11.456.
This work was supported by Sport Canada end Hydra-Fitness Industries. In order to investigate the effects of velocity-specific resistance training, 30 healthy, male varsity athletes were assigned to either high (HVR) or low (LVR) velocity training or control (CG) groups. Subjects completed two 20-sec sets of maximal exercise at each of six hydraulic resistance stations for the lower limb. Resistances were adjusted as necessary to maintain consistent average angular velocities of approximately 1.05 and 3.14 rad/sec for the LVR and HVR groups, respectively. Subjects trained on alternate days for 6 weeks, completing either two (weeks 1 and 2) or three (weeks 3-6) circuits of the six stations each session. Peak knee extension torques were improved (p < 0.05) for the LVR group at all of seven angular velocities tested between 1.05 and 4.19 rad/sec. Improvements (p < 0.05) were also observed for the HVR group, but only at angular velocities of 2.62, 3.14, 3.66, and 4.19 rad/sec. Cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris muscle group obtained from serial computer tomography (CT) scans was increased (p < 0.05) for both training groups. No significant changes in either strength or cross-sectional area were observed for control subjects. These results indicate that while both of the training programs resulted in increased cross-sectional area of the knee extensors, the observed changes in strength performance are likely due to other factors which may be mediated by the different training velocities. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1989;10(11):456-462.
这项工作得到了加拿大体育部和 Hydra-Fitness 工业公司的支持。为了研究速度特异性阻力训练的效果,将 30 名健康的男性大学运动员分配到高(HVR)或低(LVR)速度训练或对照组(CG)。受试者在每个下肢的 6 个液压阻力站完成 2 组 20 秒的最大运动。根据需要调整阻力,以保持 LVR 和 HVR 组的平均角速度分别约为 1.05 和 3.14 rad/sec。受试者每隔一天训练 6 周,每次训练完成 6 个站中的 2 个(第 1 周和第 2 周)或 3 个(第 3-6 周)循环。在测试的 7 个角速度(1.05-4.19 rad/sec)中,LVR 组的膝关节伸肌峰值扭矩均有提高(p<0.05)。HVR 组也观察到了改善(p<0.05),但仅在 2.62、3.14、3.66 和 4.19 rad/sec 的角速度下。从连续计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描获得的股四头肌肌群组的横截面积增加(p<0.05),两个训练组均有增加。对照组的力量或横截面积均无明显变化。这些结果表明,虽然两种训练方案都导致了膝关节伸肌的横截面积增加,但观察到的力量表现的变化可能是由于其他因素所致,这些因素可能通过不同的训练速度来介导。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1989;10(11):456-462。