Dowker Ann
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):650-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00713.x.
This study investigated individual differences in different aspects of early number concepts in preschoolers. Eighty 4-year-olds from Oxford nursery classes took part. They were tested on accuracy of counting sets of objects; the cardinal word principle; the order irrelevance principle; and predicting the results of repeated addition and subtraction by 1 from a set of objects. There were marked individual differences for most tasks. Most children were reasonably proficient at counting and 70% understood the cardinal word principle. Based on the results of a repeated addition and subtraction by 1 task, the children were divided into three approximately equal groups: those who were already able to use an internalized counting sequence for the simplest forms of addition and subtraction; those who relied on a repeated 'counting-all' procedure for such tasks; and those who were as yet unable to cope with such tasks. In each group, significant relationships between some, but not all, of the numerical tasks were found. However, for almost any two tasks, it was possible to find individuals who could carry out either one of the tasks but not the other. Thus, even before formal instruction, arithmetical cognition is not unitary but is made up of many components.
本研究调查了学龄前儿童早期数字概念不同方面的个体差异。来自牛津幼儿园班级的80名4岁儿童参与了研究。他们接受了以下测试:物体集合计数的准确性;基数词原则;顺序无关原则;以及预测从一组物体中每次加1或减1的重复加减法结果。大多数任务都存在显著的个体差异。大多数儿童在计数方面相当熟练,70%的儿童理解基数词原则。根据每次加1或减1任务的结果,孩子们被分成大致相等的三组:那些已经能够使用内化的计数序列进行最简单加减法运算的孩子;那些在这类任务中依赖重复“逐一计数”程序的孩子;以及那些还无法应对这类任务的孩子。在每组中,发现了部分(而非全部)数字任务之间的显著关系。然而,对于几乎任意两项任务,都能找到只能完成其中一项任务而无法完成另一项任务的个体。因此,即使在接受正式教育之前,算术认知也不是单一的,而是由许多成分组成的。