Patterson J H
U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Sensory Research Division, Fort Rucker, Alabama 36362-5292.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul;90(1):205-8. doi: 10.1121/1.401289.
Peak pressure has been one of the key parameters of impulse noise used to assess the hazard to hearing. It is used in most international noise exposure limits. France uses an A-weighted energy limit. There is a rough correspondence between peak pressure and the hazard to hearing for a given type of impulse noise. However, when the effects of different types of impulses are compared, this correspondence breaks down. One of the alternate measures of impulse intensity is weighted energy. Weighted energy is appealing for a number of reasons. It does not depend on details of the pressure-time history such as the peak pressure and the more common duration measures. It should be easier to integrate with continuous or intermittent noise standards. It would make it easier to use standard hearing protector attenuation to estimate the hazard when a specific hearing protector is worn. Results of previously published articles and reports will be discussed. These reports lead to the conclusion that weighted energy is a more potent determiner of hearing hazard than peak pressure if spectral effects are controlled.
峰值压力一直是用于评估听力危害的脉冲噪声的关键参数之一。它被用于大多数国际噪声暴露限值中。法国采用A加权能量限值。对于给定类型的脉冲噪声,峰值压力与听力危害之间存在大致的对应关系。然而,当比较不同类型脉冲的影响时,这种对应关系就不成立了。脉冲强度的替代测量方法之一是加权能量。加权能量因其多种原因而颇具吸引力。它不依赖于压力-时间历程的细节,如峰值压力和更常见的持续时间测量。它应该更容易与连续或间歇噪声标准相结合。当佩戴特定的听力保护器时,使用标准听力保护器的衰减来估计危害会更容易。将讨论先前发表的文章和报告的结果。这些报告得出的结论是,如果控制频谱效应,加权能量比峰值压力更能有效确定听力危害。