Chen Eric C, Kakkad Dhruvi, Balzano Julie
Division of Psychological and Educational Services, Graduate School of Education, Fordham University at Lincoln Center, New York, NY 10023-7478, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;64(11):1261-78. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20533.
The multicultural competence (MC) and evidence-based practice (EBP) initiatives have each generated healthy debates in the mental health field, with ample implications for clinical training and practice. Using two case illustrations, we highlight practical challenges and prospects in the intersection of MC and EBP. To facilitate complementary practice of MC and EBP, we offer strategies for the group therapist as a "local clinical scientist" to deliver culturally responsive treatments. We stress the importance of cultural adaptation of EBP models, namely, modifying evidence-based interventions that involve changes in service delivery, in the nature of the therapeutic relationship, or in components of the treatment itself to accommodate the cultural beliefs and behaviors of racial-cultural minority clients. Cultural adaptation of EBP in group therapy needs to be grounded in developmental contextualism and social justice. We discuss the two cases with an eye toward advancing multicultural competence in group therapy.
多元文化能力(MC)和循证实践(EBP)倡议在心理健康领域都引发了有益的讨论,对临床培训和实践具有广泛影响。通过两个案例说明,我们突出了MC与EBP交叉领域的实际挑战和前景。为促进MC和EBP的互补实践,我们为团体治疗师提供策略,使其成为“本地临床科学家”,以提供具有文化适应性的治疗。我们强调对EBP模型进行文化调适的重要性,即修改循证干预措施,这些措施涉及服务提供方式、治疗关系性质或治疗本身组成部分的改变,以适应种族文化少数群体客户的文化信仰和行为。团体治疗中EBP的文化调适需要以发展情境主义和社会正义为基础。我们讨论这两个案例,旨在提高团体治疗中的多元文化能力。