Barclay Victoria C, Chan Brian H K, Anders Robin F, Read Andrew F
School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Vaccine. 2008 Nov 11;26(48):6099-107. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
Malaria parasites are frequently polymorphic at the antigenic targets of many candidate vaccines, presumably as a consequence of selection pressure from protective immune responses. Conventional wisdom is therefore that vaccines directed against a single variant could select for non-target variants, rendering the vaccine useless. Many people have argued that a solution is to develop vaccines containing the products of more than one variant of the target. However, we are unaware of any evidence that multi-allele vaccines better protect hosts against parasites or morbidity. Moreover, selection of antigen-variants is not the only evolution that could occur in response to vaccination. Increased virulence could also be favored if more aggressive strains are less well controlled by vaccine-induced immunity. Virulence and antigenic identity have been confounded in all studies so far, and so we do not know formally from any animal or human studies whether vaccine failure has been due to evasion of protective responses by variants at target epitopes, or whether vaccines are just less good at protecting against more aggressive strains. Using the rodent malaria model Plasmodium chabaudi and recombinant apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1), we tested whether a bi-allelic vaccine afforded greater protection from parasite infection and morbidity than did vaccination with the component alleles alone. We also tested the effect of mono- and bi-allelic vaccination on within-host selection of mixed P. chabaudi infections, and whether parasite virulence mediates pathogen titres in immunized hosts. We found that vaccination with the bi-allelic AMA-1 formulation did not afford the host greater protection from parasite infection or morbidity than did mono-allelic AMA-1 immunization. Mono-allelic immunization increased the frequency of heterologous clones in mixed clone infections. There was no evidence that any type of immunization regime favored virulence. A single AMA-1 variant is a component of candidate malaria vaccines current in human trials; our results suggest that adding extra AMA-1 alleles to these vaccines would not confer clinical benefits, but that that mono-allelic vaccines could alter AMA-1 allele frequencies in natural populations.
疟原虫在许多候选疫苗的抗原靶点上常常具有多态性,这可能是保护性免疫反应产生的选择压力所致。因此,传统观点认为,针对单一变体的疫苗可能会选择出非目标变体,从而使疫苗失效。许多人认为,解决办法是开发包含目标多个变体产物的疫苗。然而,我们并未发现任何证据表明多等位基因疫苗能更好地保护宿主抵御寄生虫或预防发病。此外,抗原变体的选择并非接种疫苗后可能发生的唯一进化方式。如果更具侵袭性的菌株受疫苗诱导的免疫控制较差,那么增加毒力也可能受到青睐。到目前为止,所有研究中都混淆了毒力和抗原特性,因此我们无法从任何动物或人体研究中正式得知疫苗失效是由于目标表位的变体逃避了保护性反应,还是疫苗在抵御更具侵袭性的菌株方面效果较差。我们使用啮齿动物疟疾模型——查巴迪疟原虫和重组顶端膜抗原1(AMA-1),测试了双等位基因疫苗是否比单独接种组成等位基因能提供更好的保护以抵御寄生虫感染和发病。我们还测试了单等位基因和双等位基因接种对宿主体内查巴迪疟原虫混合感染选择的影响,以及寄生虫毒力是否介导免疫宿主中的病原体滴度。我们发现,与单等位基因AMA-1免疫相比,双等位基因AMA-1制剂接种并未为宿主提供更好的保护以抵御寄生虫感染或发病。单等位基因免疫增加了混合克隆感染中异源克隆的频率。没有证据表明任何一种免疫方案有利于毒力。单一AMA-1变体是目前正在进行人体试验的候选疟疾疫苗的一个组成部分;我们的结果表明,在这些疫苗中添加额外的AMA-1等位基因不会带来临床益处,但单等位基因疫苗可能会改变自然种群中AMA-1等位基因的频率。