Btoush Rula, Campbell Jacquelyn C, Gebbie Kristine M
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey School of Nursing, Newark, NJ 07101, USA.
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Oct;34(5):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.10.015. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
This study was conducted to explore the characteristics of intimate partner violence (IPV) victims whose visit was coded as IPV and the health care delivery system in emergency departments (ED).
This study utilized a secondary data analysis of a national probability sample that comprised the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 1997 to 2001.
There were 111 coded ED visits of IPV victims 16 years or older (equivalent of 482,979 out of 4 million national visits for the 5-year study period). Women (94%), African Americans (35%), those 25 to 44 years of age (64%), and uninsured patients (38%) were significantly more likely to be categorized as an IPV visit (odds ratios 14, 1.9, 2.7, and 2.4, respectively) compared with non-IPV visits. Characteristics of the health care delivery system (region, metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan, type of hospital, and type of health care provider) were not associated with IPV.
Caution should be implemented when interpreting the study results because they represent only coded IPV visits in the emergency department. The study findings suggest the critical need to improve identification, documentation, and coding of IPV visits.
本研究旨在探讨就诊时被编码为亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的受害者的特征以及急诊科的医疗服务系统。
本研究对1997年至2001年全国医院门诊医疗调查这一全国概率样本进行了二次数据分析。
16岁及以上的IPV受害者有111次就诊被编码(在为期5年的研究期间,全国400万次就诊中相当于482,979次)。与非IPV就诊相比,女性(94%)、非裔美国人(35%)、25至44岁的人(64%)以及未参保患者(38%)被归类为IPV就诊的可能性显著更高(比值比分别为14、1.9、2.7和2.4)。医疗服务系统的特征(地区、大都市与非大都市、医院类型以及医疗服务提供者类型)与IPV无关。
在解释研究结果时应谨慎,因为它们仅代表急诊科中被编码的IPV就诊。研究结果表明迫切需要改进IPV就诊的识别、记录和编码。