HRRC/ICMR, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;24(4):329-34. doi: 10.1002/gps.2127.
The paper explores the diverse ethical issues in the care of persons with dementia, in the Netherlands and Kerala, India. These cross-cultural data are used to suggest newer ways for addressing the ethical issues in a mutually enhancing manner.
A thorough review of the literature focusing on ethical aspects of the care for persons with dementia.
The medical paradigm is dominant in the Netherlands and awareness of dementia as an organic brain disease is low in Kerala. Institutionalized care is more common in the Netherlands and home-based care is the norm in Kerala. Institutional care is costly, whereas home-based care is stressful for caregivers. The advanced directive plays an influential role in the Netherlands, but this mechanism is yet to evolve in Kerala. The legal and social setting of the Netherlands has a strong influence on physician decision-making concerning end of life issues. In Kerala, discussion of these matters is nearly unknown.
Limited awareness of dementia in Kerala should be addressed in public forums, which can then be used to garner governmental support. The predominantly institutional model of care-giving in the Netherlands and home-based care-giving in Kerala, each have their strengths; policy makers in both societies can usefully apply the values and merits inherent in both models. A culturally appropriate implementation of the advanced directive will have beneficial medical, social, and economic impacts in Kerala. The remarkable disparity between the Netherlands and Kerala in dealing with end-of-life issues will allow more philosophically and socially informed ways of addressing the ethical questions that arise in those situations.
本文探讨了荷兰和印度喀拉拉邦在痴呆症患者护理方面的各种伦理问题。这些跨文化数据被用来以相互促进的方式提出解决这些伦理问题的新方法。
对关注痴呆症患者护理伦理方面的文献进行了全面回顾。
在荷兰,医学模式占主导地位,而喀拉拉邦对痴呆症作为一种器质性脑疾病的认识较低。在荷兰,机构护理更为常见,而在喀拉拉邦,家庭护理是常态。机构护理费用高昂,而家庭护理对护理人员来说压力很大。在荷兰,预先指示在很大程度上影响着医生对临终问题的决策,但这种机制在喀拉拉邦尚未形成。荷兰的法律和社会环境对医生在临终问题上的决策有很强的影响。在喀拉拉邦,几乎不讨论这些问题。
喀拉拉邦对痴呆症的认识有限,应在公共论坛上加以解决,然后可以利用这些论坛争取政府的支持。荷兰以机构为基础的护理模式和喀拉拉邦以家庭为基础的护理模式各有其优势;两个社会的政策制定者都可以有效地利用这两种模式所固有的价值观和优点。在喀拉拉邦,以文化上适当的方式实施预先指示,将对医疗、社会和经济产生有益的影响。荷兰和喀拉拉邦在处理临终问题方面存在显著差异,这为解决这些情况下出现的伦理问题提供了更具哲学性和社会性的方法。