Suppr超能文献

胫骨骨折愈合后取出内固定物。

Hardware removal after tibial fracture has healed.

作者信息

Sidky Adam, Buckley Richard E

机构信息

University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alta.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2008 Aug;51(4):263-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fracture. The standard of care for the treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures is an intramedullary nail (IMN). Implant removal is one of the most common procedures in bone and joint surgery, and criteria for implant removal are typically left to the treating surgeon. Currently, no clear criteria exist to guide a surgeon's decision to remove implanted tibial IMNs after healing.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective chart review of a single surgeon's practice from January 1996 to February 2005. We identified patients aged 16-70 years with a tibial fracture treated with an IMN. Patients were followed until fracture union and/or request for IMN removal. The following parameters were recorded: reason for implant removal, age, sex, mechanism of fracture, location of fracture, diameter of IMN, Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) status, activity level, litigation status, insurance involvement, height, weight and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Factors influencing the likelihood of removal were sex and litigation. Factors not influencing the likelihood of removal were age, weight, height, BMI, diameter of IMN, patients' level of activity, insurance claim involvement and WCB involvement. Overall, 72.2% of patients had an improvement in their symptoms after IMN removal.

CONCLUSION

Sex and litigation are positive predictive factors for patient requests to have tibial IMNs removed after healing.

摘要

背景

胫骨骨折是最常见的长骨骨折。治疗胫骨干骨折的标准治疗方法是髓内钉(IMN)。内植物取出是骨与关节外科最常见的手术之一,内植物取出的标准通常由主刀医生决定。目前,尚无明确标准指导外科医生在骨折愈合后决定取出植入的胫骨髓内钉。

方法

我们对一位外科医生在1996年1月至2005年2月期间的临床实践进行了回顾性病历审查。我们确定了年龄在16 - 70岁之间、接受髓内钉治疗的胫骨骨折患者。对患者进行随访直至骨折愈合和/或要求取出髓内钉。记录了以下参数:取出内植物的原因、年龄、性别、骨折机制、骨折部位、髓内钉直径、工人赔偿委员会(WCB)状态、活动水平、诉讼状态、保险参与情况、身高、体重和体重指数(BMI)。

结果

影响取出可能性的因素是性别和诉讼。不影响取出可能性的因素是年龄、体重、身高、BMI、髓内钉直径、患者活动水平、保险索赔参与情况和WCB参与情况。总体而言,72.2%的患者在取出髓内钉后症状有所改善。

结论

性别和诉讼是骨折愈合后患者要求取出胫骨髓内钉的阳性预测因素。

相似文献

1
4
Risk factors for deep infection in secondary intramedullary nailing after external fixation for open tibial fractures.
Injury. 2006 Jun;37(6):554-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.08.026. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
5
Tibial intramedullary nails -- should they be removed? A retrospective study of 71 patients.
Acta Orthop. 2007 Oct;78(5):668-71. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014374.
6
[Effect of interlocking intramedullary nail in treatment of open tibial and fibula fractures].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Mar;23(3):268-70.
7
The effect of retained intramedullary nails on tibial bone mineral density.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Jul;23(6):839-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
8
Intramedullary bone formation after intramedullary nailing.
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Apr;23(4):288-93. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819f1d9b.
9
Comparison of intramedullary nailing versus plate-screw fixation of extra-articular metacarpal fractures.
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Dec;33(10):1724-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.011.

引用本文的文献

1
A Linked Population-Based Analysis of Severe Lower Extremity Traumas in Ontario.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 May;33(2):297-305. doi: 10.1177/22925503231217515. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
3
Predictors of Hardware Removal in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients Undergoing Syndesmotic Ankle Fixation With Screws.
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Sep 16;8(3):24730114231198841. doi: 10.1177/24730114231198841. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Is Elective Implant Removal after Fracture Healing Beneficial? - A Prospective Cohort Study.
Malays Orthop J. 2022 Nov;16(3):55-60. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.010.
5
Suprapatellar nail removal after suprapatellar nailing of the tibia: it could work!
Acta Biomed. 2022 Mar 10;92(S3):e2021559. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.12548.
6
Removing a suprapatellar intramedullary nail via a suprapatellar approach: a retrospective cohort study.
Int Orthop. 2022 May;46(5):1145-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05329-w. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
7
Extraction of Broken Tibial Interlock Nail with a Retrograde Hooked Guide Wire: A Novel Surgical Technique.
J Orthop Case Rep. 2021 May;11(5):38-40. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i05.2196.
8
Factors associated with subsequent surgical procedures after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Jan;31(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02733-z. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
10
Use of Fentanyl Patch and Intravenous Morphine for Treatment of Leg Bone Fracture: Treatment Profile, and Clinical Effectiveness.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 10;6(12):2301-2305. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.413. eCollection 2018 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Hardware removal: indications and expectations.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Feb;14(2):113-20. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200602000-00006.
3
Chronic pain, work performance and litigation.
Pain. 2003 May;103(1-2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00380-9.
4
Intramedullary femoral nailing: removing the nail improves subjective outcome.
Injury. 2002 Apr;33(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00145-0.
7
Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified.
Injury. 1999 Mar;30(2):79-81. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00200-9.
8
Playing with metal: fracture implants and contact sport.
Br J Sports Med. 1997 Dec;31(4):319-21. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.4.319.
9
Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome.
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Feb-Mar;11(2):103-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199702000-00006.
10
Knee pain after tibial nailing.
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jan;11(1):10-3. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199701000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验