Ajayi Ikeoluwapo O, Browne Edmund N, Bateganya Fred, Yar Denis, Happi Christian, Falade Catherine O, Gbotosho Grace O, Yusuf Bidemi, Boateng Samuel, Mugittu Kefas, Cousens Simon, Nanyunja Miriam, Pagnoni Franco
Malaria Research Laboratories, Institute of Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Malar J. 2008 Sep 27;7:190. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-190.
The use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) at the community level has been advocated as a means to increase access to effective antimalarial medicines by high risk groups living in underserved areas, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. This strategy has been shown to be feasible and acceptable to the community. However, the parasitological effectiveness of ACT when dispensed by community medicine distributors (CMDs) within the context of home management of malaria (HMM) and used unsupervised by caregivers at home has not been evaluated.
In a sub-set of villages participating in a large-scale study on feasibility and acceptability of ACT use in areas of high malaria transmission in Ghana, Nigeria and Uganda, thick blood smears and blood spotted filter paper were prepared from finger prick blood samples collected from febrile children between six and 59 months of age reporting to trained CMDs for microscopy and PCR analysis. Presumptive antimalarial treatment with ACT (artesunate-amodiaquine in Ghana, artemether-lumefantrine in Nigeria and Uganda) was then initiated. Repeat finger prick blood samples were obtained 28 days later for children who were parasitaemic at baseline. For children who were parasitaemic at follow-up, PCR analyses were undertaken to distinguish recrudescence from re-infection. The extent to which ACTs had been correctly administered was assessed through separate household interviews with caregivers having had a child with fever in the previous two weeks.
Over a period of 12 months, a total of 1,740 children presenting with fever were enrolled across the study sites. Patent parasitaemia at baseline was present in 1,189 children (68.3%) and varied from 60.1% in Uganda to 71.1% in Ghana. A total of 606 children (51% of infected children) reported for a repeat test 28 days after treatment. The crude parasitological failure rate varied from 3.7% in Uganda (C.I. 1.2%-6.2%) to 41.8% in Nigeria (C.I. 35%-49%). The PCR adjusted parasitological cure rate was greater than 90% in all sites, varying from 90.9% in Nigeria (C.I. 86%-95%) to 97.2% in Uganda (C.I. 95%-99%). Reported adherence to correct treatment in terms of dose and duration varied from 81% in Uganda (C.I. 67%-95%) to 97% in Ghana (C.I. 95%-99%) with an average of 94% (C.I. 91%-97%).
While follow-up rates were low, this study provides encouraging data on parasitological outcomes of children treated with ACT in the context of HMM and adds to the evidence base for HMM as a public health strategy as well as for scaling-up implementation of HMM with ACTs.
提倡在社区层面使用以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法(ACT),作为增加生活在服务欠缺地区(主要是撒哈拉以南非洲)的高危人群获得有效抗疟药物的途径。这一策略已被证明对社区而言是可行且可接受的。然而,在疟疾家庭管理(HMM)背景下由社区药物分发员(CMD)分发并由家庭照料者在家中无监督使用时,ACT的寄生虫学疗效尚未得到评估。
在参与关于加纳、尼日利亚和乌干达疟疾高传播地区使用ACT的可行性和可接受性的大规模研究的部分村庄中,从向经过培训的CMD报告的6至59个月发热儿童采集的手指针刺血样制备厚血涂片和血斑滤纸,用于显微镜检查和PCR分析。然后开始用ACT进行推定抗疟治疗(加纳使用青蒿琥酯 - 阿莫地喹,尼日利亚和乌干达使用蒿甲醚 - 本芴醇)。对于基线时寄生虫血症阳性的儿童,在28天后获取重复手指针刺血样。对于随访时寄生虫血症阳性的儿童,进行PCR分析以区分复发和再感染。通过与前两周内有发热儿童的照料者进行单独的家庭访谈,评估ACT的正确给药程度。
在12个月期间,研究地点共纳入1740名发热儿童。1189名儿童(68.3%)基线时存在明显寄生虫血症,在乌干达为60.1%,在加纳为71.1%。共有606名儿童(占感染儿童的51%)在治疗28天后前来进行重复检测。粗寄生虫学失败率在乌干达为3.7%(置信区间1.2% - 6.2%),在尼日利亚为41.8%(置信区间35% - 49%)。所有地点经PCR调整后的寄生虫学治愈率均大于90%,在尼日利亚为90.9%(置信区间86% - 95%),在乌干达为97.2%(置信区间95% - 99%)。报告的在剂量和疗程方面正确治疗的依从性在乌干达为81%(置信区间67% - 95%),在加纳为97%(置信区间95% - 99%),平均为94%(置信区间91% - 97%)。
虽然随访率较低,但本研究提供了关于在HMM背景下接受ACT治疗的儿童寄生虫学结果的令人鼓舞的数据,并为HMM作为一种公共卫生策略以及扩大HMM与ACT的实施增加了证据基础。