Brügger-Andersen Trygve, Pönitz Volker, Staines Harry, Grundt Heidi, Hetland Øyvind, Nilsen Dennis W T
Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2008 Oct;19(7):701-7. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32830b1512.
D-dimer and fibrin monomer both reflect a prothrombotic potential. There are limited data available comparing these two markers of activated coagulation in a prospective manner in an unselected patient population presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. In addition, their role in risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndrome is still under evaluation. Therefore, we wanted to assess the prognostic value of these markers with respect to long-term all-cause mortality in 871 patients admitted to the emergency department. Blood samples were obtained immediately following admission. After a follow-up period of 24 months, 123 patients had died. In the univariate analysis, both D-dimer and fibrin monomer predicted all-cause mortality within 2 years with an odds ratio of 7.78 (95% confidence interval, 3.95-15.33) and 4.19 (95% confidence interval, 2.42-7.28), respectively, in the highest quartile (Q4) compared with the lowest quartile (Q1). However, in the multivariable logistic regression model for death within 2 years, the odds ratio of D-dimer and fibrin monomer was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 3.97) and 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 2.04) in Q4 compared with Q1, respectively, and added no prognostic information above and beyond age, known coronary heart disease, B-type natriuretic peptide and the index diagnoses of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris. In an unselected patient population hospitalized with chest pain and potential acute coronary syndrome, neither D-dimer nor fibrin monomer provided complementary prognostic information to established risk determinants during long-term follow-up.
D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白单体均反映促血栓形成潜能。在因胸痛就诊于急诊科的未选择患者群体中,以前瞻性方式比较这两种活化凝血标志物的数据有限。此外,它们在急性冠脉综合征患者风险分层中的作用仍在评估中。因此,我们想评估这些标志物对871例入住急诊科患者长期全因死亡率的预后价值。入院后立即采集血样。经过24个月的随访期,123例患者死亡。在单变量分析中,与最低四分位数(Q1)相比,最高四分位数(Q4)的D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白单体均预测2年内全因死亡率,优势比分别为7.78(95%置信区间,3.95 - 15.33)和4.19(95%置信区间,2.42 - 7.28)。然而,在2年内死亡的多变量逻辑回归模型中,与Q1相比,Q4的D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白单体的优势比分别为1.80(95%置信区间,0.81至3.97)和1.04(95%置信区间,0.53至2.04),并且在年龄、已知冠心病、B型利钠肽以及ST段抬高型心肌梗死、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛的指标诊断之外,未提供额外的预后信息。在因胸痛和潜在急性冠脉综合征住院的未选择患者群体中,在长期随访期间,D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白单体均未为既定的风险决定因素提供补充预后信息。