Suppr超能文献

台湾地区妇科检查中医师认知与实际操作之间的差异。

Discrepancy between physicians' perceptions and practices during pelvic examinations in Taiwan.

作者信息

Chen Shu-Ling, Jane Sui-Whi, Yu Yu-Mei Chao, Hsieh Yeu-Sheng

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hung Kuang University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study explored (1) physicians' perceptions of pelvic examination (PE) procedures and (2) the discrepancy between physicians' perceptions and their practices as observed by their attending nurses.

METHOD

Data were collected from 20 physician-completed questionnaires on the perceived importance of 23 PE procedures. Each physician's practice of the same 23 PE procedures was assessed by 4-6 attending nurses (100 nurse observations). Physicians and nurses were sampled by convenience from the obstetrics/gynecology outpatient departments of 3 teaching hospitals in central Taiwan. Discrepancies between physicians' perceptions and their practices as assessed by attending nurses were examined by the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Physicians' mean scores ranged from 3.15 to 4.00, indicating that PE procedures were generally perceived as important. The procedures were rank ordered according to the mean scores from highest to lowest. Physicians' 5 top-ranking procedures were wearing gloves during the PE, asking agreement for the examination, paying attention to privacy during the PE, protecting the woman's personal information, and protecting the woman's medical records. Physicians' 5 lowest ranking procedures were telling the woman before inserting the speculum that she will feel some pressure, explaining the procedure before the PE, proactively providing information, asking the woman how she feels during the PE, asking a woman's permission to examine prior to commencing the PE, and describing observations to the woman during the PE (the last two procedures were tied for 5th rank). For 15 of the 23 PE procedures, physicians' perceptions did not differ significantly from their practices as assessed by attending nurses. The remaining 8 procedures were statistically significant between physicians' perception and their practices, and were rated higher by physicians (perception) than by attending nurses (practice).

CONCLUSION

The 5 top-ranking PE procedures in terms of perceived importance were related to procedural behaviors, whereas the 5 lowest ranking procedures were verbal statements with explicit affective content. During nurse-observed PEs, Taiwanese physicians consistently practiced the procedural aspects of PEs they perceived as important (e.g., communication and consultation, protection and skilled technique, and confidentiality). However, physicians' practices were less consistent in affective aspects (e.g., explanation and consent, information and instruction, and sensitivity).

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our results suggest that physicians should concentrate not only on procedural behaviors, but also on affective behaviors. These findings could be incorporated in medical education, particularly for medical students training to become obstetric and gynecological physicians.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了(1)医生对盆腔检查(PE)程序的看法,以及(2)医生的看法与主治护士观察到的他们的实际操作之间的差异。

方法

收集了20份医生填写的关于23项PE程序重要性认知的问卷数据。由4至6名主治护士对每位医生的23项相同PE程序的操作进行评估(共100次护士观察)。医生和护士通过便利抽样从台湾中部3家教学医院的妇产科门诊选取。通过曼-惠特尼U检验来检验医生的看法与主治护士评估的他们的实际操作之间的差异。

结果

医生的平均得分在3.15至4.00之间,表明PE程序总体上被认为是重要的。这些程序根据平均得分从高到低进行排序。医生排名前5的程序是在盆腔检查时戴手套、征得检查同意、在盆腔检查时注意隐私、保护女性个人信息以及保护女性病历。医生排名后5的程序是在插入窥器前告知女性她会感到一些压力、在盆腔检查前解释程序、主动提供信息、询问女性在盆腔检查时的感受、在开始盆腔检查前征得女性检查许可以及在盆腔检查时向女性描述观察结果(最后两项程序并列第5名)。在23项PE程序中的15项,医生的看法与主治护士评估的他们的实际操作没有显著差异。其余8项程序在医生的看法和他们的实际操作之间具有统计学意义,且医生(看法)的评分高于主治护士(实际操作)。

结论

就认知重要性而言,排名前5的PE程序与操作行为相关,而排名后5的程序是带有明确情感内容的言语表述。在护士观察的盆腔检查中,台湾医生始终践行他们认为重要的盆腔检查的操作方面(如沟通与咨询、保护与熟练技术以及保密)。然而,医生在情感方面(如解释与同意、信息与指导以及敏感性)的操作不太一致。

实践意义

我们的结果表明,医生不仅应专注于操作行为,还应关注情感行为。这些发现可纳入医学教育,特别是针对培训成为妇产科医生的医学生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验