Mead Gillian E, Morley Wendy, Campbell Paul, Greig Carolyn A, McMurdo Marion, Lawlor Debbie A
School of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Edinburgh, Room F1424, Royal Infirmary, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK, EH16 4SA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub3.
Depression is a common and important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Depression is commonly treated with antidepressants and/or psychotherapy, but some people may prefer alternative approaches such as exercise. There are a number of theoretical reasons why exercise may improve depression.
To determine the effectiveness of exercise in the treatment of depression.
We searched Medline, Embase, Sports Discus, PsycLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for eligible studies. In addition, we hand-searched several relevant journals, contacted experts in the field, searched bibliographies of retrieved articles, and performed citation searches of identified studies. We also searched www.controlled-trials.com.
Randomised controlled trials in which exercise was compared to standard treatment, no treatment or a placebo treatment in adults (aged 18 and over) with depression, as defined by trial authors. We excluded trials of post-natal depression.
We calculated effect sizes for each trial using Cohen's method and a standardised mean difference (SMD) for the overall pooled effect, using a random effects model. Where trials used a number of different tools to assess depression, we included the main outcome measure only in the meta-analysis.
Twenty-eight trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria, of which 25 provided data for meta-analyses. Randomisation was adequately concealed in a minority of studies, most did not use intention to treat analyses and most used self-reported symptoms as outcome measures. For the 23 trials (907 participants) comparing exercise with no treatment or a control intervention, the pooled SMD was -0.82 (95% CI -1.12, -0.51), indicating a large clinical effect. However, when we included only the three trials with adequate allocation concealment and intention to treat analysis and blinded outcome assessment, the pooled SMD was -0.42 (95% CI -0.88, 0.03) i.e. moderate, non-significant effect. The effect of exercise was not significantly different from that of cognitive therapy. There was insufficient data to determine risks and costs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Exercise seems to improve depressive symptoms in people with a diagnosis of depression, but when only methodologically robust trials are included, the effect sizes are only moderate and not statistically significant. Further, more methodologically robust trials should be performed to obtain more accurate estimates of effect sizes, and to determine risks and costs. Further systematic reviews could be performed to investigate the effect of exercise in people with dysthymia who do not fulfil diagnostic criteria for depression.
抑郁症是全球范围内发病和死亡的常见且重要原因。抑郁症通常采用抗抑郁药和/或心理治疗,但有些人可能更喜欢运动等替代方法。运动可能改善抑郁症有多种理论原因。
确定运动治疗抑郁症的有效性。
我们检索了医学期刊数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、体育文献数据库(Sports Discus)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycLIT)、考克兰对照试验注册库以及考克兰系统评价数据库,以查找符合条件的研究。此外,我们还手工检索了几本相关期刊,联系了该领域的专家,检索了所获文章的参考文献,并对已识别研究进行了引文检索。我们还检索了www.controlled-trials.com。
随机对照试验,其中将运动与标准治疗、不治疗或安慰剂治疗进行比较,受试对象为试验作者定义的患有抑郁症的成年人(18岁及以上)。我们排除了产后抑郁症试验。
我们使用科恩方法为每个试验计算效应量,并使用随机效应模型计算总体合并效应的标准化均数差(SMD)。当试验使用多种不同工具评估抑郁症时,我们在荟萃分析中仅纳入主要结局指标。
28项试验符合我们的纳入标准,其中25项提供了荟萃分析数据。少数研究充分隐藏了随机分配方案,大多数未采用意向性分析,且大多数使用自我报告症状作为结局指标。对于23项将运动与不治疗或对照干预进行比较的试验(907名参与者),合并SMD为-0.82(95%可信区间-1.12,-0.51),表明有较大临床效果。然而,当我们仅纳入三项随机分配方案隐藏充分、采用意向性分析且结局评估设盲的试验时,合并SMD为-0.42(95%可信区间-0.88,0.03),即效果中等且无统计学意义。运动的效果与认知疗法的效果无显著差异。确定风险和成本的数据不足。
运动似乎能改善已确诊抑郁症患者的抑郁症状,但仅纳入方法学严谨的试验时,效应量仅为中等且无统计学意义。此外,应开展更多方法学严谨的试验,以更准确地估计效应量,并确定风险和成本。可进行进一步的系统评价,以研究运动对未达到抑郁症诊断标准的心境恶劣障碍患者的影响。