Neubert Antje, Wong Ian C K, Bonifazi Alessandro, Catapano Mariana, Felisi Mariagrazia, Baiardi Paola, Giaquinto Carlo, Knibbe Catherijne A J, Sturkenboom Miriam C J M, Ghaleb Maisoon A, Ceci Adriana
Centre for Paediatric Pharmacy Research, The School of Pharmacy, University of London and Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pharmacol Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;58(5-6):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
The aim of this Delphi survey is to develop common definitions for unlicensed and off-label drug use in children to be used for research and regulatory purposes. After a literature review on the current status of unlicensed/off-label definitions, a two-stage, web-based Delphi survey was conducted among experts in Europe. Their opinion on concerns, rules and scenarios regarding the unlicensed and off-label use of medicines were obtained. Results were then consulted with the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) before the final proposal was circulated to participants. Eighty-four experts were invited to participate (scientists, health professionals, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies), 34 responded to the first round questionnaire and participated in subsequent rounds. Consensus was reached for the majority of questions. The lowest level of consensus reached was for questions related to a different formulation or if a drug was given although contraindicated. At the final step, 85% of the responding experts agreed on the proposed definition for off-label (use of a drug already covered by a Marketing Authorisation, in an unapproved way) and 80% on the definition for unlicensed (use of a drug not covered by a Marketing Authorisation as medicinal for human use), respectively. Results will facilitate the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies and allow comparison between different countries. The Delphi panel agreed that the definitions should be circulated within the scientific community and recommended to be adopted by relevant regulatory authorities.
这项德尔菲调查的目的是为儿童无许可证和超说明书用药制定通用定义,以供研究和监管之用。在对无许可证/超说明书定义的现状进行文献综述之后,在欧洲专家中开展了两阶段的基于网络的德尔菲调查。获取了他们对药品无许可证和超说明书使用的相关问题、规则及情形的意见。然后在向参与者分发最终提案之前,与欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)进行了磋商。邀请了84位专家参与(科学家、卫生专业人员、制药公司、监管机构),34位回复了第一轮问卷并参与了后续轮次。大多数问题达成了共识。达成共识程度最低的是与不同剂型相关的问题,以及在禁忌情况下仍用药的问题。在最后一步,85%的回复专家同意超说明书(以未经批准的方式使用已获上市许可的药品)的提议定义,80%的回复专家同意无许可证(使用未获人类用药上市许可的药品)的定义。研究结果将有助于开展药物流行病学研究,并便于不同国家之间进行比较。德尔菲小组一致认为,这些定义应在科学界内分发,并建议相关监管当局予以采用。