Speicher L A, Sheridan V R, Godwin A K, Tew K D
Department of Pharmacology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111.
Br J Cancer. 1991 Aug;64(2):267-73. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.290.
Following EMS mutagenesis, three estramustine (EM) resistant DU 145 human prostatic carcinoma cell lines were clonally selected by exposure to incrementally increasing concentrations of the drug. Although only low levels of resistance (approximately 3-fold) were attainable, this resistance was stable in the absence of continuous drug exposure. These EM-resistant clones (EMR 4,9,12) did not exhibit cross resistance to vinblastine, taxol, or adriamycin, and had collateral sensitivity to cytochalasin B. None of the lines had elevated expression of P-glycoprotein mRNA or glutathione S-transferase activity, suggesting a phenotype distinct from the classic multi-drug resistance phenotype. This conclusion was supported further by the observation that two MDR cell lines (FLC mouse erythroleukaemic and SKOV3 human ovarian carcinoma cells) showed sensitivity to EM. Fluorescent activated cell sorting analysis of the effects of EM on cell cycle traverse revealed that at EM concentrations up to 20 microM an increasing percentage of wild type cells were blocked in G2/M; no such effect occurred in EMR lines. Differential interference contrast microscopy was employed to study EM's effect on mitosis. EMR lines were able to form functional, albeit smaller, spindles at EM concentrations that resulted in chromosomal disorganisation and inhibition of mitotic progression in wild type cells. EMR lines were able to progress through mitosis and cytokinesis at the same rate as untreated cells. Tritiated EM was used to evaluate potential drug uptake/efflux mutations in ERM clones. EMR 4 and 9 incorporate less EM than wild type cells; however, they have significantly decreased cellular volumes. The initial efflux rate constants for EMR clones were greater than for wild type cells. Within 5 min greater than 70% of the drug was lost from resistant cells compared to a 50% loss by the wild type. Although the specific mechanisms of resistance have yet to be defined, the lack of collateral resistance to other MDR/anti-microtubule agents could serve as the basis for the clinical use of EM in combination chemotherapy.
经EMS诱变后,通过暴露于逐渐增加浓度的药物,克隆筛选出三株对雌莫司汀(EM)耐药的DU 145人前列腺癌细胞系。尽管只能获得低水平的耐药性(约3倍),但在无持续药物暴露的情况下,这种耐药性是稳定的。这些EM耐药克隆(EMR 4、9、12)对长春碱、紫杉醇或阿霉素无交叉耐药性,对细胞松弛素B有协同敏感性。这些细胞系均未出现P-糖蛋白mRNA表达升高或谷胱甘肽S-转移酶活性增强的情况;提示其表型与经典的多药耐药表型不同。观察到两株多药耐药细胞系(FLC小鼠红白血病细胞和SKOV3人卵巢癌细胞)对EM敏感,进一步支持了这一结论。荧光激活细胞分选分析EM对细胞周期进程的影响发现,在EM浓度高达20μM时,野生型细胞中被阻滞在G2/M期的细胞百分比增加;而EMR细胞系未出现这种效应。采用微分干涉相差显微镜研究EM对有丝分裂的影响。在导致野生型细胞染色体紊乱和抑制有丝分裂进程的EM浓度下,EMR细胞系能够形成功能正常但较小的纺锤体。EMR细胞系能够以与未处理细胞相同的速率进行有丝分裂和胞质分裂。用氚标记的EM评估ERM克隆中潜在的药物摄取/外排突变。EMR 4和9摄取的EM比野生型细胞少;然而,它们的细胞体积显著减小。EMR克隆的初始外排速率常数大于野生型细胞。5分钟内,耐药细胞中超过70%的药物流失,而野生型细胞的药物流失率为50%。尽管耐药的具体机制尚未明确,但对其他多药耐药/抗微管药物无协同耐药性这一点可作为EM在联合化疗中临床应用的基础。