Suppr超能文献

[低分子量肝素与非瓣膜性心房颤动]

[Low molecular weight heparin and non valvular atrial fibrillation].

作者信息

Ederhy S, Di Angelantonio E, Meuleman C, Janower S, Boccara F, Cohen A

机构信息

Hôpital Saint-Antoine, service de cardiologie, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Antoine, Paris.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2006 Dec;99(12):1210-4.

Abstract

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are obtained through chemical or enzyme depolymerisation of unfractioned heparins (UFH). LMWHs present several advantages over UFH: they exhibit a smaller interindividual variability of the anticoagulant effect, they have a greater bioavailability, a longer plasma half-life and do not require monitoring of the anticoagulant effect. LMWH have restrictive indications in AF patients, cardioversion (II level C and TEE for ACC/AHA/ESC and 2C for ACCP guidelines) or use as a bridge therapy (IIB, level C for ACC/AHA/ESC). The ACE study (Anticoagulation for cardioversion using enoxaparin), showed a reduction, though not statistically significant, of 42% of the composite end point (embolic event, major bleeding and death) 2.8% under enoxaparin vs. 4.8 % under conventional treatment, relative risk 0.58, CI 95% 0.23-1.46). Other studies, using dalteparin, confirmed that an anticoagulant treatment using LMWH followed by warfarin was at least as good as conventional management. ACUTE II (Assessment of cardioversion using transesophageal echochardiography), a randomized multicenter trial, compared the efficacy and tolerance of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg every 12 hours) and UFH in 155 patients eligible for a TEE-guided cardioversion. These patients were administered LMWH or UFH for 24 hours before TEE or cardioversion. There were no significative differences regarding the incidence of the study end points, in particular stroke and bleeding, and no death occurred. HAEST (Heparin in acute embolic stroke trial), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial failed to show the LMWH superiority over aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation. Finally, LMWH have been proposed as a bridge therapy in patients under chronic VKA prior to surgery or invasive procedures. This strategy resulted in a low rate of thromboembolic events and major bleedings.

摘要

低分子量肝素(LMWH)是通过对普通肝素(UFH)进行化学或酶解聚而获得的。与UFH相比,LMWH具有几个优点:它们在抗凝效果上表现出较小的个体间变异性,具有更高的生物利用度、更长的血浆半衰期,并且不需要监测抗凝效果。LMWH在房颤患者、心脏复律(ACC/AHA/ESC指南为II级C类和TEE,ACCP指南为2C类)或用作桥接治疗(ACC/AHA/ESC为IIB级,C类)方面有严格的适应症。ACE研究(使用依诺肝素进行心脏复律的抗凝治疗)显示,依诺肝素组复合终点(栓塞事件、大出血和死亡)降低了42%,虽无统计学意义,依诺肝素组为2.8%,传统治疗组为4.8%,相对风险0.58,95%置信区间0.23 - 1.46)。其他使用达肝素的研究证实,使用LMWH后再使用华法林的抗凝治疗至少与传统治疗效果相当。ACUTE II(使用经食管超声心动图评估心脏复律)是一项随机多中心试验,比较了依诺肝素(每12小时1 mg/kg)和UFH在155例适合TEE引导下心脏复律患者中的疗效和耐受性。这些患者在TEE或心脏复律前24小时接受LMWH或UFH治疗。研究终点的发生率,特别是中风和出血方面,没有显著差异,也没有死亡发生。HAEST(急性栓塞性中风试验中的肝素)是一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验,未能显示LMWH在急性缺血性中风和房颤患者中优于阿司匹林。最后,LMWH已被提议作为慢性VKA治疗患者在手术或侵入性操作前的桥接治疗。该策略导致血栓栓塞事件和大出血发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验