Periole Xavier, Allen Lucy R, Tamiola Kamil, Mark Alan E, Paci Emanuele
Department of Biophysical Chemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute (GBB), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Comput Chem. 2009 May;30(7):1059-68. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21128.
The free-energy landscape of a small protein, the FBP 28 WW domain, has been explored using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with alternative descriptions of the molecule. The molecular models used range from coarse-grained to all-atom with either an implicit or explicit treatment of the solvent. Sampling of conformation space was performed using both conventional and temperature-replica exchange MD simulations. Experimental chemical shifts and NOEs were used to validate the simulations, and experimental phi values both for validation and as restraints. This combination of different approaches has provided insight into the free energy landscape and barriers encountered by the protein during folding and enabled the characterization of native, denatured and transition states which are compatible with the available experimental data. All the molecular models used stabilize well defined native and denatured basins; however, the degree of agreement with the available experimental data varies. While the most detailed, explicit solvent model predicts the data reasonably accurately, it does not fold despite a simulation time 10 times that of the experimental folding time. The less detailed models performed poorly relative to the explicit solvent model: an implicit solvent model stabilizes a ground state which differs from the experimental native state, and a structure-based model underestimates the size of the barrier between the two states. The use of experimental phi values both as restraints, and to extract structures from unfolding simulations, result in conformations which, although not necessarily true transition states, appear to share the geometrical characteristics of transition state structures. In addition to characterizing the native, transition and denatured states of this particular system in this work, the advantages and limitations of using varying levels of representation are discussed.
利用分子动力学(MD)模拟并采用不同的分子描述方法,对一种小蛋白质——FBP 28 WW 结构域的自由能景观进行了探索。所使用的分子模型范围从粗粒度模型到全原子模型,溶剂处理方式既有隐式的也有显式的。采用传统的和温度复制交换 MD 模拟对构象空间进行采样。实验化学位移和核 Overhauser 效应(NOE)用于验证模拟结果,实验 phi 值则用于验证和作为约束条件。这种不同方法的结合,为蛋白质折叠过程中遇到的自由能景观和障碍提供了深入了解,并能够表征与现有实验数据相符的天然态、变性态和过渡态。所有使用的分子模型都能很好地稳定明确的天然态和变性态盆地;然而,与现有实验数据的吻合程度各不相同。虽然最详细的显式溶剂模型能相当准确地预测数据,但尽管模拟时间是实验折叠时间的 10 倍,它仍无法折叠。相对于显式溶剂模型,不太详细的模型表现较差:隐式溶剂模型稳定的基态与实验天然态不同,基于结构的模型低估了两个状态之间障碍的大小。将实验 phi 值既用作约束条件,又从解折叠模拟中提取结构,得到的构象虽然不一定是真正的过渡态,但似乎具有过渡态结构的几何特征。除了在这项工作中表征这个特定系统的天然态、过渡态和变性态外,还讨论了使用不同表示水平的优点和局限性。