Phytopathology. 2007 Jun;97(6):694-701. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-6-0694.
ABSTRACT Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, causal agent of tan spot of wheat, produces multiple host-selective toxins (HSTs), including Ptr ToxA, Ptr ToxB, and Ptr ToxC. The specific complement of HSTs produced by a particular isolate determines its host cultivar specificity. Each unique specificity profile, represented by the differential induction of necrosis or chlorosis on a standard set of wheat differentials, defines a unique race. Eight races of P. tritici-repentis have been formally published, although additional races are under investigation. Although visual assessment of disease phenotype is often used in race designation of P. tritici-repentis, our results suggest that it has the potential to be misleading. Inoculation of the P. tritici-repentis isolates SO3 and PT82 on the current wheat differential set indicated classification as race 2 and race 8, respectively; however, genetic characterization revealed that these isolates do not possess the associated HSTs expected for these race assignments. Despite sharing disease phenotypes similar to known races, SO3 and PT82 were genotypically distinct from these previously characterized races of P. tritici-repentis. To ensure detection of the breadth of physiological variation among the isolates of P. tritici-repentis, our results indicate that race classification, where possible, should include both phenotypic and genotypic analyses and eventual expansion of the differential set.
摘要 小麦叶枯病菌,引起小麦叶枯病,产生多种寄主选择性毒素(HSTs),包括 Ptr ToxA、Ptr ToxB 和 Ptr ToxC。特定分离物产生的 HST 特定组合决定了其寄主品种特异性。每个独特的特异性谱,通过在标准小麦鉴别品种上诱导坏死或黄化的差异来表示,定义了一个独特的小种。已经正式公布了 8 个小麦叶枯病菌小种,但还有其他小种正在研究中。尽管通常使用病害表型的视觉评估来对小麦叶枯病菌进行小种命名,但我们的结果表明,它有可能产生误导。对 P. tritici-repentis 分离物 SO3 和 PT82 的接种表明,它们分别属于小种 2 和小种 8;然而,遗传特征表明,这些分离物不具有与这些小种分配相关的 HSTs。尽管 SO3 和 PT82 与已知小种具有相似的病害表型,但它们在基因型上与以前表征的 P. tritici-repentis 小种明显不同。为了确保检测到 P. tritici-repentis 分离物之间生理变异的广度,我们的结果表明,在可能的情况下,小种分类应包括表型和基因型分析,并最终扩展鉴别品种。