Suppr超能文献

在儿科介入放射学服务中进行死亡率和发病率评估的经验:一项回顾性研究。

The experience of conducting Mortality and Morbidity reviews in a pediatric interventional radiology service: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Tuong Betty, Shnitzer Ziv, Pehora Carolyne, Choi Perry, Levine Mark, Krishnamurthy Ganesh, Chait Peter, Temple Michael, John Philip, Amaral Joao, Connolly Bairbre

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jan;20(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review the experience and impact of conducting multidisciplinary Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) reviews in pediatric interventional radiology (IR) and describe issues, lessons, and recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dedicated functionality of an existing database was developed to retrospectively analyze pediatric IR M&M issues. Patient demographics, sedation/anesthesia, and procedure type were recorded. M&M issues were assigned to at least one of 10 categories and graded as major or minor per Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. Issues could result in recommendations, which were divided into six categories; each was classified as implemented or not implemented.

RESULTS

Of 31,983 patient encounters over a period of 10 years, 516 patient events (1.6%) were discussed at M&M reviews. A total of 772 categories were assigned; they related to the procedure (34%), patient comorbidity (20%), processes (15%), device (10%), management (8%), sedation/anesthesia (4%), medication (2%), ethical issues (1%), "near-misses" (1%), and other (5%). A total of 292 issues (57%) were graded as minor (SIR class A, n = 202; class B, n = 90) and 224 (43%) as major (SIR class C, n = 42; class D, n = 151; class E, n = 6; class F, n = 27). Twenty-seven deaths were reviewed. Of 397 recommendations made, 80% were fully implemented, 11% partially implemented, and 9% not implemented. Recommendations made related to process improvements (49%), technical changes (20%), interdisciplinary discussions (15%), educational endeavors (9%), contacting manufacturers (6%), and other issues (1%).

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of regular multidisciplinary M&M reviews being conducted, a large number of practical recommendations were made for improvements in quality of care, and implemented over a 10-year period. M&M reviews provide a useful forum for team discussions and are a vehicle for change and potential improvement in the delivery of care in a pediatric IR service.

摘要

目的

回顾在儿科介入放射学(IR)中开展多学科发病率和死亡率(M&M)审查的经验及影响,并描述相关问题、经验教训和建议。

材料与方法

利用现有数据库的一项专门功能,对儿科IR的M&M问题进行回顾性分析。记录患者人口统计学信息、镇静/麻醉情况及手术类型。M&M问题被归入10个类别中的至少一类,并根据介入放射学会(SIR)指南分为主要或次要问题。问题可能会产生建议,这些建议分为6类;每类又分为已实施或未实施。

结果

在10年期间的31983次患者诊疗中,有516例患者事件(1.6%)在M&M审查中被讨论。共分配了772个类别;它们与手术(34%)、患者合并症(20%)、流程(15%)、设备(10%)、管理(8%)、镇静/麻醉(4%)、药物(2%)、伦理问题(1%)、“险些发生的失误”(1%)及其他(5%)有关。共有292个问题(57%)被评为次要问题(SIR A类,n = 202;B类,n = 90),224个(43%)为主要问题(SIR C类,n = 42;D类,n = 15 l;E类,n = 6;F类,n = 27)。审查了27例死亡病例。在提出的397条建议中,80%得到充分实施,11%部分实施,9%未实施。提出的建议涉及流程改进(49%)、技术变革(20%)、跨学科讨论(15%)、教育工作(9%)、联系制造商(6%)及其他问题(1%)。

结论

由于定期开展多学科M&M审查,提出了大量关于改善医疗质量的实用建议,并在10年期间得到实施。M&M审查为团队讨论提供了一个有用的平台,是儿科IR服务中护理提供方式变革和潜在改进的一种手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验