Khadilkar Satish V, Patil Shekhar G, Amin Sanjeev N
Department of Neurology, Grant Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
Neurol India. 2008 Jul-Sep;56(3):356-62. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.43456.
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) form important treatable myopathies, hence it is important to recognize and categorize them. In some cases, the differential diagnosis between IIM and muscular dystrophies can be difficult.
To study the clinical and laboratory features of patients with IIMs and compare and contrast this group with limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs).
A prospective study for the period of five years [1999-2004] was undertaken at a tertiary neuromuscular center.
Bohan and Peter criteria were used for the diagnosis of IIM and Bushby criteria were used for the diagnosis of LGMD. Patients underwent history, clinical examination, hematological tests, electrophysiological studies and muscle biopsy. The biopsies were studied for histology and immunocytochemistry. A clinical scoring system was evolved to differentiate IIM from LGMD and was validated in a blinded manner. Receiver operator curves were used as the statistical method to analyze the sensitivity and specificity.
In the IIM group, dermatomyositis was most common, followed by polymyositis, occurring in young females. Overlap group was less common. In patients with polymyositis, onset in upper girdle was associated with adverse outcome. The scoring system helped to differentiate IIM from LGMD, mainly using clinical pointers. This was particularly valuable in chronic cases.
特发性炎性肌病(IIM)构成重要的可治疗性肌病,因此识别并对其进行分类很重要。在某些情况下,IIM与肌营养不良症之间的鉴别诊断可能很困难。
研究IIM患者的临床和实验室特征,并将该组患者与肢带型肌营养不良症(LGMD)进行比较和对比。
在一家三级神经肌肉中心进行了为期五年(1999 - 2004年)的前瞻性研究。
采用博汉和彼得标准诊断IIM,采用布什比标准诊断LGMD。患者接受病史采集、临床检查、血液学检查、电生理研究和肌肉活检。对活检组织进行组织学和免疫细胞化学研究。制定了一个临床评分系统以区分IIM和LGMD,并以盲法进行验证。采用受试者操作特征曲线作为统计方法分析敏感性和特异性。
在IIM组中,皮肌炎最常见,其次是多发性肌炎,多见于年轻女性。重叠综合征较少见。在多发性肌炎患者中,上肢带起病与不良预后相关。该评分系统有助于区分IIM和LGMD,主要使用临床指标。这在慢性病例中尤其有价值。