Jager Daniel F, Wilmking Martin, Kukkonen Jussi V K
Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Grimmerstrasse 88, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Feb 1;407(4):1373-82. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
A small peatland catchment in eastern Finland was monitored for runoff and export of dissolved organic carbon. To exemplify the response of a peatland under years of different meteorological conditions, data from one very dry and one wet growing season are presented. Runoff was 194 and 387 mm, and DOC export was 4.2 and 11.3 gC m(-2) in the dry and wet year respectively. Analysis of the hydrographs showed that in both years most runoff and DOC export was generated during peak flow events, with low baseflow in the intermediate periods. Runoff response to rain events was strongest under a high water table in the spring and autumn, with a summer runoff minimum. The effect of drought on runoff occurred only after mid June when the effects of snowmelt had dissipated. Snowmelt therefore dominated DOC export in the dry year (61%) but contributed much less (29%) in the wet year. The relationship between runoff and the water table was highly similar in both years. Any variation that was observed herein was potentially related to a superficial subsidence of the peat surface under drier summer conditions and to raised spring water levels, causing restricted drainage due to flooding. The observed variation of DOC concentrations in both years generally had a limited impact on DOC export. During peak runoff events, concentrations dropped proportionally to the magnitude of the events. This decrease in available DOC is argued to be caused by a dominance of leaching over supply and production and by the specific hydraulic characteristics of the peatland surface. DOC concentrations were some 25% higher under drought conditions. These elevated concentrations were dispelled by spring snowmelt of the next year, demonstrating that a winter snowpack in boreal regions may be instrumental in limiting the longer term hydrological and biochemical effects of a drought.
对芬兰东部一个小型泥炭地集水区的径流和溶解有机碳输出进行了监测。为了举例说明泥炭地在不同气象条件年份下的响应情况,给出了一个非常干旱和一个湿润生长季的数据。干旱年份和湿润年份的径流分别为194毫米和387毫米,溶解有机碳输出分别为4.2克碳每平方米和11.3克碳每平方米。对水文过程线的分析表明,在这两年中,大部分径流和溶解有机碳输出都发生在洪峰流量事件期间,中间时段基流较低。在春季和秋季高地下水位条件下,径流对降雨事件的响应最强,夏季径流最少。干旱对径流的影响仅在6月中旬积雪融化的影响消散后才出现。因此,在干旱年份,融雪主导了溶解有机碳的输出(61%),但在湿润年份贡献要小得多(29%)。两年中径流与地下水位之间的关系高度相似。本文观察到的任何变化可能与夏季较干燥条件下泥炭表面的浅层沉降以及春季水位上升有关,春季水位上升导致洪水造成排水受限。两年中观察到的溶解有机碳浓度变化通常对溶解有机碳输出的影响有限。在径流峰值事件期间,浓度与事件规模成比例下降。可用溶解有机碳的这种减少被认为是由于淋溶超过供应和生产以及泥炭地表面特定的水力特性所致。干旱条件下溶解有机碳浓度大约高25%。这些升高的浓度在次年春季融雪时消散,这表明北方地区的冬季积雪可能有助于限制干旱的长期水文和生化影响。