Suppr超能文献

在帕金森病患者中,训练效果超过单次常规重复经颅磁刺激和theta爆发刺激的效果。

Training effects outweigh effects of single-session conventional rTMS and theta burst stimulation in PD patients.

作者信息

Rothkegel Holger, Sommer Martin, Rammsayer Thomas, Trenkwalder Claudia, Paulus Walter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):373-81. doi: 10.1177/1545968308322842. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Focal single-session repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex has been claimed to be capable of improving motor function in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to determine which type of rTMS protocol holds the highest potential for future therapeutic application.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with Parkinson's disease received 5 different rTMS protocols on 5 consecutive days in a pseudorandomized and counterbalanced order either in the defined OFF condition or with their usual medication. The protocols tested in the present study included 2 conventional rTMS protocols (0.5 and 10 Hz) as well as the recently introduced theta burst stimulation (cTBS, iTBS) and a sham condition. Cortical excitability, motor performance (pointing movement, pronation-supination, Purdue Pegboard Test, walking), and mood were assessed before and after each session.

RESULTS

The authors observed motor training from days 1 to 4, particularly in the group on dopaminergic medication. None of the rTMS paradigms excelled placebo stimulation. The only exception was the Purdue Pegboard Test, in which all active stimulation paradigms yielded slightly stronger effects than sham stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a single session, no clinically relevant difference in the rTMS protocols could be detected. Training effects outweigh and may have masked rTMS effects, particularly in the group on dopaminergic mediation.

摘要

背景

有观点认为,对初级运动皮层进行单次聚焦重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)能够改善帕金森病的运动功能。

目的

作者试图确定哪种rTMS方案在未来治疗应用中具有最大潜力。

方法

22例帕金森病患者在“关”期或服用常用药物的情况下,按照伪随机、平衡的顺序,连续5天接受5种不同的rTMS方案。本研究中测试的方案包括2种传统rTMS方案(0.5赫兹和10赫兹)以及最近引入的theta爆发刺激(cTBS、iTBS)和假刺激条件。在每次治疗前后评估皮质兴奋性、运动表现(指物运动、旋前-旋后、普渡钉板测试、步行)和情绪。

结果

作者观察到从第1天到第4天有运动训练效果,尤其是在服用多巴胺能药物的组中。没有一种rTMS模式优于安慰剂刺激。唯一的例外是普渡钉板测试,其中所有主动刺激模式产生的效果略强于假刺激。

结论

在单次治疗中,未检测到rTMS方案之间存在临床相关差异。训练效果超过并可能掩盖了rTMS的效果,尤其是在服用多巴胺能药物的组中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验