Pepping Gert-Jan, Li François-Xavier
Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Center for Sport, Exercise and Health, and Center for Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Mot Behav. 2008 Nov;40(6):491-8. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.6.491-498.
The authors performed an experiment in which participants (N = 24) made judgments about maximum jump and reachability on ground surfaces with different elastic properties: sand and a trampoline. Participants performed judgments in two conditions: (a) while standing and after having recently jumped on the surface in question and (b) while standing on a third control surface, eliminating haptic exploration of the surface in question. There was a high correlation between perceived maximum reachable height and actual maximum reachable height in all conditions. Judging performance on the basis of visual and haptic exploration of ground surface information was slightly overestimated, whereas performance on the basis of visual information alone was underestimated and variable for the different surfaces. The authors discuss possible causes for the observed errors. They emphasize that there is a considerable nonvisual aspect to the nature of the information specifying affordances for overhead reach and jumping and that perceptual performance is degraded when spontaneous exploratory movement is restricted.
作者进行了一项实验,其中参与者(N = 24)对具有不同弹性特性的地面(沙子和蹦床)上的最大跳跃和可及性进行判断。参与者在两种条件下进行判断:(a)站立时以及最近在相关地面上跳跃之后;(b)站在第三个对照地面上,排除对相关地面的触觉探索。在所有条件下,感知到的最大可及高度与实际最大可及高度之间都存在高度相关性。基于对地面信息的视觉和触觉探索进行的判断表现略有高估,而仅基于视觉信息的表现则被低估,并且在不同地面上有所变化。作者讨论了观察到的误差的可能原因。他们强调,对于头顶够物和跳跃的可供性而言,信息的本质存在相当大的非视觉方面,并且当自发探索运动受到限制时,感知表现会下降。