Schug M, Heise T, Bauer A, Storm D, Blaszkewicz M, Bedawy E, Brulport M, Geppert B, Hermes M, Föllmann W, Rapp K, Maccoux L, Schormann W, Appel K E, Oberemm A, Gundert-Remy U, Hengstler J G
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Ardeystrasse 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Arch Toxicol. 2008 Dec;82(12):923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00204-008-0375-x. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
Recent studies have presented evidence that in vivo obtained gene expression data can be used for carcinogen classification, for instance to differentiate between genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. However, although primary rat hepatocytes represent a well-established in vitro system for drug metabolism and enzyme induction, they have not yet been systematically optimized for toxicogenomic studies. The latter may be confounded by the fact that cultured hepatocytes show strong spontaneous alterations in gene expression patterns. Therefore, we addressed the following questions: (1) which culture system is optimal, comparing sandwich, Matrigel and 2D cultures, (2) how critical is the impact of culture period on substance-induced alterations in gene expression and (3) do these substance-induced alterations in cultured hepatocytes occur already at in vivo relevant concentrations? For this purpose we analyzed the expression of four genes, namely Abat, Gsk3beta, Myd116 and Sult1a1 that recently have been reported to be influenced by the antihistamine and non-genotoxic carcinogen methapyrilene (MPy). The most reproducible effects of MPy were observed in sandwich cultures. Induction factors of Gsk3beta and Myd116 at 100 microM MPy were 2 and 4 (medians), respectively, whereas expression of Abat and Sult1a1 were inhibited by factors of 7 and 5, respectively. Similar results were observed in hepatocytes maintained for 24 h or 3 weeks in sandwich culture with respect to the influence of MPy on the expression of Abat, Gsk3beta, Myd116 and Sult1a1. To determine whether MPy influences gene expression at in vivo relevant concentrations, 3.5 mg/kg MPy were administered to male Wistar rats intraperitoneally, resulting in plasma concentrations ranging between 1.72 and 0.32 microM 5 and 80 min after injection. Inhibition of Abat and Sult1a1 expression in vitro already occurred at in vivo relevant concentrations of 0.39 microM MPy. Induction of Myd116 was observed at 6.25 microM which is higher but in the same order of magnitude as in vivo relevant concentrations. In conclusion, the presented data strongly suggest that sandwich cultures are most adequate for detection of MPy-induced gene expression alterations and the effect of MPy was detected at in vivo relevant concentrations.
最近的研究表明,体内获得的基因表达数据可用于致癌物分类,例如区分遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物。然而,尽管原代大鼠肝细胞是一种成熟的体外药物代谢和酶诱导系统,但尚未针对毒理基因组学研究进行系统优化。后者可能因培养的肝细胞在基因表达模式上表现出强烈的自发改变这一事实而受到干扰。因此,我们提出了以下问题:(1)比较三明治培养、基质胶培养和二维培养,哪种培养系统是最佳的;(2)培养时间对物质诱导的基因表达改变的影响有多关键;(3)这些物质诱导的培养肝细胞基因表达改变是否在体内相关浓度下就已发生?为此,我们分析了四个基因的表达,即Abat、Gsk3beta、Myd116和Sult1a1,最近有报道称这些基因受抗组胺药和非遗传毒性致癌物甲吡咯(MPy)的影响。在三明治培养中观察到MPy最具重复性的效应。在100微摩尔MPy时,Gsk3beta和Myd116的诱导因子分别为2和4(中位数),而Abat和Sult1a1的表达分别被抑制7倍和5倍。在三明治培养中维持24小时或3周的肝细胞中,关于MPy对Abat、Gsk3beta、Myd116和Sult1a1表达的影响也观察到了类似结果。为了确定MPy是否在体内相关浓度下影响基因表达,给雄性Wistar大鼠腹腔注射3.5毫克/千克MPy,注射后5分钟和80分钟血浆浓度在1.72至0.32微摩尔之间。在体外,Abat和Sult1a1表达的抑制在体内相关浓度0.39微摩尔MPy时就已发生。在6.25微摩尔时观察到Myd116的诱导,该浓度高于体内相关浓度,但处于同一数量级。总之,所呈现的数据强烈表明三明治培养最适合检测MPy诱导的基因表达改变,并且在体内相关浓度下检测到了MPy的效应。