Prasad Priya A, Coffin Susan E, Leckerman Kateri H, Walsh Thomas J, Zaoutis Theoklis E
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infection Prevention and Control, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Dec;27(12):1083-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31817eeee5.
The frequency and severity of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients has increased steadily over the last 2 decades. In response to the increased incidence and high mortality rates, novel antifungal agents have been developed to expand the breadth and effectiveness of treatment options available to clinicians. Despite these therapeutic advances, the impact of the availability of new antifungal agents on pediatric practice is unknown.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pediatric Health Information System database to describe the changes in pediatric antifungal therapy at 25 freestanding United States children's hospitals from 2000 to 2006. All pediatric inpatients who received a charge for one or more of the following agents were included in the analysis: conventional amphotericin B (AMB), lipid amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, flucytosine, caspofungin, and micafungin. Underlying conditions and fungal infection status were ascertained.
A total of 62,842 patients received antifungal therapy, with prescriptions significantly increasing during the 7-year study period (P = 0.03). The most commonly prescribed antifungal agent was fluconazole (76%), followed by amphotericin preparations (26%). Prescription of AMB steadily decreased from 2000 to 2006 (P = 0.02). Prescription of voriconazole steadily increased during the study period and replaced AMB for the treatment of aspergillosis. The echinocandins steadily increased in prescription for treatment of fungal infections, particularly in disseminated/systemic candidiasis.
We found that the number of pediatric inpatients requiring antifungal therapy has increased significantly and the choice of treatment has changed dramatically with the introduction of newer antifungal agents.
在过去20年中,免疫功能低下患者侵袭性真菌感染的频率和严重程度一直在稳步上升。为应对发病率上升和高死亡率,已开发出新型抗真菌药物,以扩大临床医生可用治疗方案的广度和有效性。尽管有这些治疗进展,但新型抗真菌药物的可用性对儿科实践的影响尚不清楚。
使用儿科健康信息系统数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以描述2000年至2006年美国25家独立儿童医院儿科抗真菌治疗的变化。所有接受以下一种或多种药物收费的儿科住院患者均纳入分析:传统两性霉素B(AMB)、脂质体两性霉素B、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、伏立康唑、氟胞嘧啶、卡泊芬净和米卡芬净。确定了基础疾病和真菌感染状况。
共有62842名患者接受了抗真菌治疗,在7年研究期间处方量显著增加(P = 0.03)。最常开具的抗真菌药物是氟康唑(76%),其次是两性霉素制剂(26%)。从2000年到2006年,AMB的处方量稳步下降(P = 0.02)。在研究期间,伏立康唑的处方量稳步增加,并取代AMB用于治疗曲霉病。棘白菌素类药物用于治疗真菌感染的处方量稳步增加,尤其是在播散性/全身性念珠菌病中。
我们发现,需要抗真菌治疗的儿科住院患者数量显著增加,随着新型抗真菌药物的引入,治疗选择发生了巨大变化。