期望与义务:专业精神以及医学与社会的社会契约
Expectations and obligations: professionalism and medicine's social contract with society.
作者信息
Cruess Richard L, Cruess Sylvia R
机构信息
Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, 1110Pine AvenueWest, Montreal, QU H3A 1A3, Canada.
出版信息
Perspect Biol Med. 2008 Autumn;51(4):579-98. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0045.
As health care has become of great importance to both individual citizens and to society, it has become more important to understand medicine's relationship to the society it serves in order to have a basis for meaningful dialogue. During the past decade, individuals in the medical, legal, social sciences, and health policy fields have suggested that professionalism serves as the basis of medicine's relationship with society, and many have termed this relationship a social contract. However, the concept of medicine's social contract remains vague, and the implications of its existence have not been fully explored. This paper endorses the use of the term social contract, examines the origin of the concept and its relationship to professionalism, traces its evolution and application to medicine, describes the expectations of the various parties to the contract, and explores some of the implications of its use.
随着医疗保健对公民个人和社会都变得极为重要,理解医学与其所服务的社会之间的关系变得更加重要,以便为有意义的对话奠定基础。在过去十年中,医学、法律、社会科学和卫生政策领域的人士提出,专业精神是医学与社会关系的基础,许多人将这种关系称为社会契约。然而,医学社会契约的概念仍然模糊不清,其存在的影响尚未得到充分探讨。本文赞同使用社会契约这一术语,审视该概念的起源及其与专业精神的关系,追溯其在医学领域的演变和应用,描述契约各方的期望,并探讨使用该术语的一些影响。