Lippert Eric, Girodon François, Hammond Emma, Jelinek Jaroslav, Reading N Scott, Fehse Boris, Hanlon Katy, Hermans Mirjam, Richard Céline, Swierczek Sabina, Ugo Valérie, Carillo Serge, Harrivel Véronique, Marzac Christophe, Pietra Daniela, Sobas Marta, Mounier Morgane, Migeon Marina, Ellard Sian, Kröger Nicolaus, Herrmann Richard, Prchal Josef T, Skoda Radek C, Hermouet Sylvie
Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Institut de Biologie, Bordeaux, France.
Haematologica. 2009 Jan;94(1):38-45. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13486. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
Many different techniques have been designed for the quantification of JAK2V617F allelic burden, sometimes producing discrepant results.
JAK2V617F quantification techniques were compared among 16 centers using 11 assays based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (with mutation-specific primers or probes, or fluorescent resonance energy transfer/melting curve analysis), allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, conventional sequencing or pyrosequencing.
A first series of blinded samples (granulocyte DNA, n=29) was analyzed. Seven assays (12 centers) reported values inside the mean +/- 2SD; the mean coefficient of variation was 31%. Sequencing techniques lacked sensitivity, and strong discrepancies were observed with four techniques, which could be attributed to inadequate standards or to different modes of expression of results. Indeed, quantification of JAK2V617F in relation to another control gene produced higher than expected values, suggesting the possibility of more than two JAK2 copies/cell. After calibration of assays with common 1% to 100% JAK2V617F standards (dilutions of UKE-1 cells in normal leukocytes), 14 centers tested ten new samples. JAK2V617F allelic burdens greater or equal than 1% were then reliably quantified by five techniques -- one allele specific-polymerase chain reaction and four TaqMan allele-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays, including one previously giving results outside the mean +/- 2SD -- with a lower mean coefficient of variation (21%). Of these, only the two TaqMan allele-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays with primer-based specificity could detect 0.2% JAK2V617F.
Techniques expressing the allelic burden as JAK2V617F/total JAK2 and using a common set of standards produced similar quantification results but with variable sensitivity. Calibration to a reference standard improved reproducibility.
已经设计了许多不同的技术用于定量JAK2V617F等位基因负荷,有时会产生不一致的结果。
16个中心使用11种基于定量聚合酶链反应(使用突变特异性引物或探针,或荧光共振能量转移/熔解曲线分析)、等位基因特异性聚合酶链反应、传统测序或焦磷酸测序的检测方法,对JAK2V617F定量技术进行了比较。
分析了第一组盲法样本(粒细胞DNA,n = 29)。七种检测方法(12个中心)报告的值在平均值±2SD范围内;平均变异系数为31%。测序技术缺乏敏感性,观察到四种技术存在强烈差异,这可能归因于标准不充分或结果表达模式不同。实际上,相对于另一个对照基因对JAK2V617F进行定量产生了高于预期的值,提示每个细胞可能有两个以上JAK2拷贝。在用常见的1%至100% JAK2V617F标准品(UKE-1细胞在正常白细胞中的稀释液)对检测方法进行校准后,14个中心检测了十个新样本。然后,通过五种技术可靠地定量了JAK2V617F等位基因负荷大于或等于1%的情况——一种等位基因特异性聚合酶链反应和四种TaqMan等位基因特异性定量聚合酶链反应检测方法,其中包括一种之前结果在平均值±2SD范围之外的方法——平均变异系数较低(21%)。其中,只有两种具有引物特异性的TaqMan等位基因特异性定量聚合酶链反应检测方法能够检测到0.2%的JAK2V617F。
将等位基因负荷表示为JAK2V617F/总JAK2并使用一组通用标准的技术产生了相似的定量结果,但敏感性不同。校准参考标准提高了重现性。