Selvakumar N, Premkumar Michel, Kumar Vanaja, Gopi P G, Sivagamasundari S, Prabhakaran E, Narayanan P R
Tuberculosis Research Centre (ICMR), Chetput, Chennai, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2008 Aug;128(2):194-7.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Improper practices of making direct smears of sputum for detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and of disposing sputum cups are hazardous. The present study was undertaken with the objective to stain sputum samples in their containers by 'phenol (10%) ammonium sulphate (4%) basic fuchsin (2%) solution' and to decolourize and counterstain their smears for detection of AFB- (henceforth called pot method) and to compare the smear results of pot method with the standard Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) method.
A total of 575 selected sputum samples from pulmonary tuberculosis patients were stained by the standard ZN and pot methods and the proportions of AFB positive smears were compared.
Of the 575 samples, 126 were AFB positive for both the staining methods and the difference was not statistically significant. Pot method missed 9 ZN positive smears (8 scanty and one 1+) and ZN method missed 9 pot positive smears (9 scanty) and the difference was not significant. High grade smears (3+) were seen more in pot method (42) than in ZN method (25) and the difference was significant.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that pot method was comparable to standard ZN method and had many advantages. Pot method can be explored further for the detection of AFB in sputum samples obtained from pulmonary tuberculosis suspects.
痰涂片直接检测抗酸杆菌(AFB)及痰杯处理不当存在危害。本研究旨在用“苯酚(10%)硫酸铵(4%)碱性复红(2%)溶液”对痰标本容器内的痰液进行染色,对涂片进行脱色和复染以检测AFB(以下简称罐法),并将罐法的涂片结果与标准萋-尼(ZN)法进行比较。
选取575份肺结核患者的痰标本,分别用标准ZN法和罐法染色,比较AFB阳性涂片的比例。
575份标本中,两种染色方法均有126份AFB阳性,差异无统计学意义。罐法漏检9份ZN阳性涂片(8份少量及1份1+),ZN法漏检9份罐法阳性涂片(9份少量),差异无统计学意义。罐法中高等级涂片(3+)的数量(42份)多于ZN法(25份),差异有统计学意义。
我们的研究结果表明,罐法与标准ZN法相当且具有许多优点。对于从肺结核疑似患者获取的痰标本,罐法可进一步探索用于检测AFB。