Tanabe Kazunari, Ishida Hideki, Shimizu Tomokazu, Omoto Kazuya, Shirakawa Hiroki, Tokumoto Tadahiko
Department of Urology, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Contrib Nephrol. 2009;162:61-74. doi: 10.1159/000170813. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
Although splenectomy has been employed in most documented protocols for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKT), its utility is not yet determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of ABO-ILKT with splenectomy, and also compare the outcome of ABO-ILKT with splenectomy versus non-splenectomy.
We did a retrospective study of ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants at our institution and affiliated hospital between January 2001 and December 2006 (n = 70). All patients were treated with a combination of immunosuppressive drugs, including tacrolimus (FK), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and methylprednisolone (MP). Between January 2001 and December 2004, all patients underwent pretransplant double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and splenectomy at the time of transplant (n = 46) (ABO-I-SPX group). Between January 2005 and December 2006, splenectomy was not performed and a protocol that involved pretransplant low-dose injection of rituximab was employed (ABO-I-RIT group). ABO-compatible living kidney transplants (n = 55) performed between January 2001 and December 2004 were employed as a control group (ABO-C group).
Patient survival was 100% in all groups. Three-year graft survival was 98.2, 93.5 and 95.8% in the ABO-C, ABO-I-SPX and ABO-I-RIT groups, respectively. Five-year graft survival was 93 and 91.3% in the ABO-C and ABO-I-SPX groups, respectively. Renal allograft function was comparable among the three groups. However, compared to the ABO-I-RIT group, the incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (acute AMR) or chronic AMR was significantly higher in the ABO-C and ABO-I-SPX groups.
Although long-term outcome of the ABO-I-SPX group was excellent and showed no significant difference compared to the ABO-C group, splenectomy is not essential for successful ABO-ILKT. The rituximab-treated patients showed excellent short-term graft survival and renal function, and the incidence of AMR in the ABO-I-RIT group was significantly reduced compared to the ABO-I-SPX group.
尽管在大多数已记载的ABO血型不相容肾移植(ABO-ILKT)方案中都采用了脾切除术,但其效用尚未确定。本研究的目的是评估行脾切除术的ABO-ILKT的长期结果,并比较行脾切除术与未行脾切除术的ABO-ILKT的结果。
我们对2001年1月至2006年12月在我院及附属医院进行的ABO血型不相容活体供肾移植进行了回顾性研究(n = 70)。所有患者均接受免疫抑制药物联合治疗,包括他克莫司(FK)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)和甲泼尼龙(MP)。2001年1月至2004年12月期间,所有患者在移植时均接受了移植前双重滤过血浆置换(DFPP)并进行了脾切除术(n = 46)(ABO-I-SPX组)。2005年1月至2006年12月期间,未进行脾切除术,采用了移植前低剂量注射利妥昔单抗的方案(ABO-I-RIT组)。将2001年1月至2004年12月期间进行的ABO血型相容活体肾移植(n = 55)作为对照组(ABO-C组)。
所有组的患者生存率均为100%。ABO-C组、ABO-I-SPX组和ABO-I-RIT组的三年移植肾生存率分别为98.2%、93.5%和95.8%。ABO-C组和ABO-I-SPX组的五年移植肾生存率分别为93%和91.3%。三组间移植肾功能相当。然而,与ABO-I-RIT组相比,ABO-C组和ABO-I-SPX组急性抗体介导排斥反应(急性AMR)或慢性AMR的发生率显著更高。
尽管ABO-I-SPX组的长期结果良好,与ABO-C组相比无显著差异,但脾切除术对于成功的ABO-ILKT并非必不可少。接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者短期移植肾生存率和肾功能良好,与ABO-I-SPX组相比,ABO-I-RIT组的AMR发生率显著降低。