Limke J C, Rainville J, Peña E, Childs L
Spine Center, New England Baptist Bone and Joint Institute Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Dec;44(4):399-405.
Progressive resistance exercises (PRE) are prescribed to reverse the deconditioning associated with chronic back pain. The spine rehabilitation program has utilized 2 sets of progressive resistance exercises during each session, with increased resistance between sets, and with successive sessions. Exercise literature has challenged the need for multiple sets of resistance exercises, with a single set producing similar functional benefits. The authors studied whether completing 1 versus 2 sets of resistance exercises would affect strength, pain and disability outcomes in subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
The study randomly assigned subjects with CLBP to perform either 1 set or 2 sets of progressive resistance exercises during otherwise identical spine rehabilitation programs. The patient sample included 100 subjects (36 male patients, 64 female patients, mean age 46 years) with chronic back pain referred to spine rehabilitation. Primary outcomes were back strength and progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation (PILE) at discharge. Secondary outcomes were Oswestry disability (0-100) and pain scores (0-10). Exercises consisted of Cybex back extension, rotary torso, pull downs, and multi-hip; lifting of crates from floor-to-waist (lumbar) and waist-to-shoulder (cervical) heights. The maximum levels of exercises were determined using a four repetition to maximum protocol, and the PILE.
At discharge, there was no significant difference in strength, disability or pain measures between subjects completing 1 versus 2 sets of resistance exercises.
These findings suggest that there were no added benefits for completing a second set of resistance exercises during therapy sessions for patients with CLBP.
进行性抗阻训练(PRE)被用于逆转与慢性背痛相关的身体机能下降。脊柱康复计划在每次训练中使用两组进行性抗阻训练,组间及连续训练之间增加阻力。运动医学文献对多组抗阻训练的必要性提出了质疑,认为单组训练能产生类似的功能效益。作者研究了完成1组与2组抗阻训练对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的力量、疼痛和功能障碍结果是否有影响。
该研究将CLBP患者随机分配,在其他方面相同的脊柱康复计划中进行1组或2组进行性抗阻训练。患者样本包括100名因慢性背痛转诊至脊柱康复科的患者(男36例,女64例,平均年龄46岁)。主要结局指标为出院时的背部力量和渐进性等惯性举升评估(PILE)。次要结局指标为Oswestry功能障碍指数(0 - 100)和疼痛评分(范围0 - 10)。训练包括Cybex背部伸展、旋转躯干、下拉和多臀练习;将箱子从地面举到腰部(腰椎)和从腰部举到肩部(颈椎)高度。使用四重复最大值方案和PILE确定训练的最大强度。
出院时,完成1组与2组抗阻训练的患者在力量测量、功能障碍或疼痛指标方面没有显著差异。
这些发现表明,对于CLBP患者,在治疗过程中完成第二组抗阻训练没有额外益处。