• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蝴蝶物种中华豆粉蝶(Leptidea sinapis)和瑞氏豆粉蝶(Leptidea reali)的寄主植物偏好与表现:食物特化权衡假说的检验

Host plant preference and performance of the sibling species of butterflies Leptidea sinapis and Leptidea reali: a test of the trade-off hypothesis for food specialisation.

作者信息

Friberg Magne, Wiklund Christer

机构信息

Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2009 Feb;159(1):127-37. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1206-8. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-008-1206-8
PMID:19002503
Abstract

A large proportion of phytophagous insect species are specialised on one or a few host plants, and female host plant preference is predicted to be tightly linked to high larval survival and performance on the preferred plant(s). Specialisation is likely favoured by selection under stable circumstances, since different host plant species are likely to differ in suitability-a pattern usually explained by the "trade-off hypothesis", which posits that increased performance on a given plant comes at a cost of decreased performance on other plants. Host plant specialisation is also ascribed an important role in host shift speciation, where different incipient species specialise on different host plants. Hence, it is important to determine the role of host plants when studying species divergence and niche partitioning between closely related species, such as the butterfly species pair Leptidea sinapis and Leptidea reali. In Sweden, Leptidea sinapis is a habitat generalist, appearing in both forests and meadows, whereas Leptidea reali is specialised on meadows. Here, we study the female preference and larval survival and performance in terms of growth rate, pupal weight and development time on the seven most-utilised host plants. Both species showed similar host plant rank orders, and larvae survived and performed equally well on most plants with the exceptions of two rarely utilised forest plants. We therefore conclude that differences in preference or performance on plants from the two habitats do not drive, or maintain, niche separation, and we argue that the results of this study do not support the trade-off hypothesis for host plant specialisation, since the host plant generalist Leptidea sinapis survived and performed as well on the most preferred meadow host plant Lathyrus pratensis as did Leptidea reali although the generalist species also includes other plants in its host range.

摘要

很大一部分植食性昆虫物种都专食一种或几种寄主植物,预计雌虫对寄主植物的偏好与幼虫在偏好植物上的高存活率和良好生长表现紧密相关。在稳定环境下,选择可能有利于物种的专一化,因为不同的寄主植物物种在适宜性上可能存在差异——这种模式通常由“权衡假说”来解释,该假说认为在某一特定植物上生长表现的提高是以在其他植物上生长表现的降低为代价的。寄主植物专一化在寄主转移物种形成中也被认为起着重要作用,不同的初始物种专食不同的寄主植物。因此,在研究近缘物种之间的物种分化和生态位划分时,比如蝴蝶物种对中华褐蛱蝶(Leptidea sinapis)和瑞氏褐蛱蝶(Leptidea reali),确定寄主植物的作用就很重要。在瑞典,中华褐蛱蝶是一种栖息地泛化种,在森林和草地中都有出现,而瑞氏褐蛱蝶则专食草地。在这里,我们研究了这两种蝴蝶在七种最常利用的寄主植物上,雌虫的偏好以及幼虫的存活率和生长表现,包括生长速率、蛹重和发育时间。两个物种对寄主植物的排序相似,除了两种很少被利用的森林植物外,幼虫在大多数植物上的存活和生长表现都一样好。因此,我们得出结论,两种栖息地的植物在偏好或生长表现上的差异并不会驱动或维持生态位分离,并且我们认为本研究结果并不支持寄主植物专一化的权衡假说,因为寄主植物泛化种中华褐蛱蝶在最偏好的草地寄主植物草地香豌豆(Lathyrus pratensis)上的存活和生长表现与瑞氏褐蛱蝶一样好,尽管泛化种的寄主范围还包括其他植物。

相似文献

1
Host plant preference and performance of the sibling species of butterflies Leptidea sinapis and Leptidea reali: a test of the trade-off hypothesis for food specialisation.蝴蝶物种中华豆粉蝶(Leptidea sinapis)和瑞氏豆粉蝶(Leptidea reali)的寄主植物偏好与表现:食物特化权衡假说的检验
Oecologia. 2009 Feb;159(1):127-37. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1206-8. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
2
Host-plant-induced larval decision-making in a habitat/host-plant generalist butterfly.生境/寄主植物广食性蝴蝶的寄主植物诱导的幼虫决策。
Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):15-21. doi: 10.1890/09-0328.1.
3
The sibling species Leptidea juvernica and L. sinapis (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) in the Balkan Peninsula: ecology, genetic structure, and morphological variation.巴尔干半岛的姊妹种莱粉蝶(Leptidea juvernica)和中华菜粉蝶(L. sinapis)(鳞翅目,粉蝶科):生态学、遗传结构及形态变异
Zoology (Jena). 2016 Feb;119(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
4
Decoupling of female host plant preference and offspring performance in relative specialist and generalist butterflies.相对专一性和广食性蝴蝶中雌性寄主植物偏好与后代表现的解耦
Oecologia. 2015 Aug;178(4):1181-92. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3286-6. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
Dynamic karyotype evolution and unique sex determination systems in Leptidea wood white butterflies.细纹白蝶动态核型进化及独特的性别决定系统
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 May 19;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0375-4.
6
Unravelling the role of host plant expansion in the diversification of a Neotropical butterfly genus.揭示寄主植物扩张在新热带蝴蝶属多样化过程中的作用。
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 16;16(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0701-5.
7
Rapid Increase in Genome Size as a Consequence of Transposable Element Hyperactivity in Wood-White (Leptidea) Butterflies.转座元件的过度活跃导致木白蝶(Leptidea)基因组大小的快速增加。
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):2491-2505. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx163.
8
Heterospecific courtship, minority effects and niche separation between cryptic butterfly species.种间求爱、少数派效应与隐种间生态位分离
J Evol Biol. 2013 May;26(5):971-9. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12106. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
9
Ecological and genetic factors influencing the transition between host-use strategies in sympatric Heliconius butterflies.影响同域共生的箭环蝶属蝴蝶在宿主利用策略之间转换的生态和遗传因素。
J Evol Biol. 2013 Sep;26(9):1959-67. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12194. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Oviposition Preference for Young Plants by the Large Cabbage Butterfly (Pieris brassicae ) Does not Strongly Correlate with Caterpillar Performance.大菜粉蝶(粉蝶属)对幼嫩植物的产卵偏好与幼虫生长表现并无紧密关联。
J Chem Ecol. 2017 Jun;43(6):617-629. doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0853-9. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in adult nutritional requirements impact the population growth and survival of two related species of rice leaffolders to produce interspecific differentiation.成年营养需求的差异影响了两种相关的稻纵卷叶螟种群的生长和存活,从而产生了种间分化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 26;14(1):17200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66512-0.
2
The genome sequence of the wood white butterfly, (Linnaeus, 1758).白钩蛱蝶(林奈,1758年)的基因组序列。
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Oct 12;7:254. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18118.1. eCollection 2022.
3
High-density linkage maps and chromosome level genome assemblies unveil direction and frequency of extensive structural rearrangements in wood white butterflies (Leptidea spp.).

本文引用的文献

1
REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN SYMPATRIC RACES OF PEA APHIDS. I. GENE FLOW RESTRICTION AND HABITAT CHOICE.豌豆蚜同域种群间的生殖隔离。I. 基因流限制与栖息地选择。
Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1446-1457. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05409.x.
2
The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L.金凤蝶成虫产卵偏好与幼虫寄主植物范围之间的进化关系
Oecologia. 1975 Sep;18(3):185-197. doi: 10.1007/BF00345421.
3
Intra- and interspecific competition and host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae).
高密度连锁图谱和染色体水平基因组组装揭示了木白蝶(Leptidea 属)中广泛结构重排的方向和频率。
Chromosome Res. 2023 Jan 20;31(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10577-023-09713-z.
4
Effective specialist or jack of all trades? Experimental evolution of a crop pest in fluctuating and stable environments.专家还是多面手?作物害虫在波动和稳定环境中的实验进化。
Evol Appl. 2022 Mar 8;15(10):1639-1652. doi: 10.1111/eva.13360. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Host plant diet affects growth and induces altered gene expression and microbiome composition in the wood white (Leptidea sinapis) butterfly.寄主植物的饮食会影响木白蝶(Leptidea sinapis)的生长,并诱导其基因表达和微生物组组成发生改变。
Mol Ecol. 2021 Jan;30(2):499-516. doi: 10.1111/mec.15745. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Dissecting the Effects of Selection and Mutation on Genetic Diversity in Three Wood White (Leptidea) Butterfly Species.剖析选择和突变对三种木白蝶(Leptidea)物种遗传多样性的影响。
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Oct 1;11(10):2875-2886. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz212.
7
Host plant range of a fruit fly community (Diptera: Tephritidae): does fruit composition influence larval performance?果蝇群落(双翅目:实蝇科)的寄主植物范围:果实成分会影响幼虫表现吗?
BMC Ecol. 2016 Sep 20;16(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0094-8.
8
Genetic integrity of four species of Leptidea (Pieridae, Lepidoptera) as sampled in sympatry in West Siberia.在西西伯利亚同域分布中采样的四种豆粉蝶(粉蝶科,鳞翅目)的遗传完整性。
Comp Cytogenet. 2015 Jun 23;9(3):299-324. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i3.4636. eCollection 2015.
9
Plant fertilization interacts with life history: variation in stoichiometry and performance in nettle-feeding butterflies.
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0124616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124616. eCollection 2015.
10
Decoupling of female host plant preference and offspring performance in relative specialist and generalist butterflies.相对专一性和广食性蝴蝶中雌性寄主植物偏好与后代表现的解耦
Oecologia. 2015 Aug;178(4):1181-92. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3286-6. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
苹果实蝇(Rhagoletis pomonella,双翅目:实蝇科)的种内和种间竞争以及寄主族形成
Oecologia. 1995 Apr;101(4):416-425. doi: 10.1007/BF00329420.
4
Enemy-free space and habitat-specific host specialization in a butterfly.蝴蝶的无天敌空间与栖息地特异性宿主专化
Oecologia. 2008 Aug;157(2):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1077-z. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
5
Evolution of larval host plant associations and adaptive radiation in pierid butterflies.粉蝶幼虫寄主植物关联的演化与适应性辐射
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1677-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01109.x.
6
Fitness consequences of choosy oviposition for a time-limited butterfly.限时繁殖蝴蝶选择性产卵的适合度后果
Ecology. 2006 Feb;87(2):395-408. doi: 10.1890/05-0647.
7
Diversity begets diversity: host expansions and the diversification of plant-feeding insects.多样性孕育多样性:宿主扩张与植食性昆虫的多样化
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Jan 18;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-4.
8
Enemy-free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift.无天敌空间维持燕尾蝶宿主转移。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18048-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406490102. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
9
Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly.寄主专一性是苹果实蝇同域种群之间一种有效的交配前隔离机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):7990-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7990.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini.寄主植物专一化的进化动态:蛱蝶族的一个案例研究
Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):783-96. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0783:edohps]2.0.co;2.