Patnaik Pratap R
Institute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, 160 036, India.
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2009 Jun;32(4):557-68. doi: 10.1007/s00449-008-0277-6. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
Cognitive (or intelligent) models are often superior to mechanistic models for nonideal bioreactors. Two kinds of cognitive models--cybernetic and neural--were applied recently to fed-batch fermentation by Ralstonia eutropha in a bioreactor with optimum finite dispersion. In the present work, these models have been applied in simulation studies of co-cultures of R. eutropha and Lactobacillus delbrueckii. The results for both cognitive and mechanistic models have been compared with single cultures. Neural models were the most effective for both types of cultures and mechanistic models the least effective. Simulations with co-culture fermentations predicted more PHB than single cultures with all three types of models. Significantly, the predicted enhancements in PHB concentration by cognitive methods for mixed cultures were four to five times larger than the corresponding increases in biomass concentration. Further improvements are possible through a hybrid combination of all three types of models.
对于非理想生物反应器,认知(或智能)模型通常优于机械模型。最近,两种认知模型——控制论模型和神经模型——被应用于在具有最佳有限扩散的生物反应器中进行的真养产碱杆菌补料分批发酵。在本研究中,这些模型已应用于真养产碱杆菌和德氏乳杆菌共培养的模拟研究。认知模型和机械模型的结果均与单一培养物进行了比较。神经模型对两种类型的培养物都是最有效的,而机械模型则是最无效的。使用共培养发酵的模拟预测,所有三种模型的聚羟基丁酸酯(PHB)产量都高于单一培养物。值得注意的是,通过认知方法预测的混合培养物中PHB浓度的提高比相应生物量浓度的增加大四到五倍。通过将所有三种模型进行混合组合,可能会有进一步的改进。