Chen Aileen B, D'Amico Anthony V, Neville Bridget A, Steyerberg Ewout W, Earle Craig C
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):113-8; discussion 118. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.034. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
We assessed the relationship between provider volume and outcomes following brachytherapy in a population based cohort of men.
We analyzed the claims of Medicare enrolled men older than 65 years living in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results surveillance areas who were diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1991 to 1999 and underwent brachytherapy as initial treatment. Case volume was calculated for each physician and hospital from 1991 to 2001 from Medicare claims. Outcomes of interest were recurrence, prostate cancer death, all deaths and 2-year complications. Analyses were adjusted by patient and treatment characteristics.
We identified 5,595 men for whom a radiation oncologist and a hospital provider could be identified. Men who were older, nonwhite, lower income, unmarried, living in nonurban areas or had more comorbidities were more likely to see lower volume physicians. Physician volume was not associated with the complication rate after brachytherapy. However, men treated at higher volume hospitals had a slightly lower rate of combined complication diagnoses and procedures (OR 0.94/100 cases, p <0.01). Patients treated by higher volume physicians had a lower recurrence rate (HR 0.89/100 cases, p = 0.01) and rate of prostate cancer death (HR 0.80/100 cases, p = 0.03) with a borderline significant decrease in all deaths (HR 0.95/100 cases, p = 0.05). There was no significant association between hospital volume and recurrence, prostate cancer death or all deaths.
Men treated with brachytherapy by higher volume physicians were at lower risk for recurrence and prostate cancer death, and showed a borderline decrease in total deaths. We did not observe a clear relationship between provider volume and complications following treatment.
我们在一个基于人群的男性队列中评估了近距离放射治疗后医疗服务提供者的治疗量与治疗结果之间的关系。
我们分析了1991年至1999年期间居住在监测、流行病学和最终结果监测区域内年龄超过65岁且参加医疗保险、被诊断为前列腺癌并接受近距离放射治疗作为初始治疗的男性的索赔数据。从医疗保险索赔数据中计算出1991年至2001年期间每位医生和医院的病例数。感兴趣的结果包括复发、前列腺癌死亡、全因死亡和2年并发症。分析根据患者和治疗特征进行了调整。
我们确定了5595名男性,他们的放射肿瘤学家和医院医疗服务提供者均可被识别。年龄较大、非白人、低收入、未婚、居住在非城市地区或合并症较多的男性更有可能接受治疗量较低的医生治疗。医生的治疗量与近距离放射治疗后的并发症发生率无关。然而,在治疗量较高的医院接受治疗的男性,其综合并发症诊断和治疗的发生率略低(每100例的比值比为0.94,p<0.01)。由治疗量较高的医生治疗的患者复发率较低(每100例的风险比为0.89,p = 0.01),前列腺癌死亡率较低(每100例的风险比为0.80,p = 0.03),全因死亡有临界显著下降(每100例的风险比为0.95,p = 0.05)。医院治疗量与复发、前列腺癌死亡或全因死亡之间无显著关联。
由治疗量较高的医生进行近距离放射治疗的男性复发和前列腺癌死亡风险较低,全因死亡有临界下降。我们未观察到医疗服务提供者治疗量与治疗后并发症之间存在明确关系。