Chen Peiqi, Krege John H, Adachi Jonathan D, Prior Jerilynn C, Tenenhouse Alan, Brown Jacques P, Papadimitropoulos Emmanuel, Kreiger Nancy, Olszynski Wojciech P, Josse Robert G, Goltzman David
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Mar;24(3):495-502. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.081103.
Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture, and patients with prevalent vertebral fractures have a greater risk of future fractures. However, radiographically determined vertebral fractures are not identified as a distinct risk factor in the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare potential risk factors including morphometric spine fracture status and the WHO risk factors for predicting 5-yr fracture risk. We hypothesized that spine fracture status provides prognostic information in addition to consideration of the WHO risk factors alone. A randomly selected, population-based community cohort of 2761 noninstitutionalized men and women > or =50 yr of age living within 50 km of one of nine regional centers was enrolled in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS), a prospective and longitudinal cohort study following subjects for 5 yr. Prevalent and incident spine fractures were identified from lateral spine radiographs. Incident nonvertebral fragility fractures were determined by an annual, mailed fracture questionnaire with validation, and nonvertebral fragility fracture was defined by investigators as a fracture with minimal trauma. A model considering the WHO risk factors plus spine fracture status provided greater prognostic information regarding future fracture risk than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. In univariate analyses, age, BMD, and spine fracture status had the highest gradient of risk. A model considering these three risk factors captured almost all of the predictive information provided by a model considering spine fracture status plus the WHO risk factors and provided greater predictive information than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. The use of spine fracture status along with age and BMD predicted future fracture risk with greater simplicity and higher prognostic accuracy than consideration of the risk factors included in the WHO tool.
椎体骨折是最常见的骨质疏松性骨折,已有椎体骨折的患者未来发生骨折的风险更高。然而,在世界卫生组织(WHO)骨折风险评估工具中,经影像学确定的椎体骨折并未被认定为一个独立的风险因素。本研究的目的是评估和比较包括形态计量学脊柱骨折状态以及WHO风险因素在内的潜在风险因素,以预测5年骨折风险。我们假设脊柱骨折状态除了单独考虑WHO风险因素外,还能提供预后信息。在加拿大多中心骨质疏松研究(CaMOS)中,纳入了一个基于人群随机选取的社区队列,该队列由居住在9个区域中心之一周边50公里范围内、年龄≥50岁的2761名非机构化男女组成,这是一项对受试者进行5年随访的前瞻性纵向队列研究。通过脊柱侧位X线片确定既往和新发的脊柱骨折。通过每年邮寄并经验证的骨折调查问卷确定新发非椎体脆性骨折,研究人员将非椎体脆性骨折定义为受到最小创伤的骨折。与仅考虑WHO风险因素的模型相比,一个同时考虑WHO风险因素和脊柱骨折状态的模型能提供更多关于未来骨折风险的预后信息。在单因素分析中,年龄、骨密度和脊柱骨折状态的风险梯度最高。一个考虑这三个风险因素的模型几乎涵盖了一个同时考虑脊柱骨折状态和WHO风险因素的模型所提供的所有预测信息,并且比仅考虑WHO风险因素的模型提供了更多的预测信息。与考虑WHO工具中所包含的风险因素相比,结合脊柱骨折状态、年龄和骨密度来预测未来骨折风险更简单,且预后准确性更高。
Bonekey Rep. 2013-9-4
Osteoporos Int. 2007-6
Kans J Med. 2024-11-15
J Clin Med. 2021-12-19
Arch Osteoporos. 2021-1-6
Osteoporos Int. 2008-4
JAMA. 2007-12-19
Osteoporos Int. 2007-6
J Bone Miner Res. 2007-2
Osteoporos Int. 2005-6