Pollard B J
Med J Aust. 1991 Apr 15;154(8):559-61. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb119456.x.
Ventilator support is commonly withdrawn from unconscious patients who cannot breathe when it is reasonably certain that their condition is permanent and further medical treatment is futile. However, there is no consistent practice with permanently unconscious patients who can breathe but cannot swallow, despite the fact that ongoing treatment of these patients is similarly futile. In both groups of patients, the withdrawal of treatment is not euthanasia, and the cause of death is properly considered to be the underlying illness. A review of the medical, legal and ethical literature shows that there is much disagreement about when and how to withdraw tube feeding from patients with severe brain damage. Criteria for withdrawal of treatment should include the permanent unconsciousness of the patient, the permanent absence of a life-sustaining function, the elapse of sufficient time to be certain about the prognosis, the concurrence of at least one independent and qualified medical specialist, and the informed consent of the patient's family or other legally qualified agents.
当有理由确定病情为永久性且进一步治疗无效时,通常会撤掉无法自主呼吸的昏迷患者的呼吸机支持。然而,对于那些能够呼吸但无法吞咽的永久性昏迷患者,目前并没有一致的做法,尽管对这些患者的持续治疗同样无效。在这两类患者中,停止治疗并非安乐死,死亡原因应恰当地认定为潜在疾病。对医学、法律和伦理文献的回顾表明,对于何时以及如何停止对重度脑损伤患者的管饲喂养,存在诸多分歧。停止治疗的标准应包括患者的永久性昏迷、维持生命功能的永久缺失、有足够时间确定预后、至少有一名独立且合格的医学专家的同意,以及患者家属或其他具有合法资格的代理人的知情同意。