Radstake T R D J, Svenson M, Eijsbouts A M, van den Hoogen F H J, Enevold C, van Riel P L C M, Bendtzen K
Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Nov;68(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092833. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) neutralising antibody constructs are increasingly being used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
To determine potential differences in clinical responses, soluble drug levels and antibody formation between patients with RA receiving infliximab and adalimumab.
69 patients with RA fulfilling the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and about to start treatment with infliximab or adalimumab, were enrolled consecutively. All patients had active disease (28-joint count Disease Activity Score >3.2). Infliximab was given intravenously at 3 mg/kg at baseline and after 2, 6 and 14 weeks. Adalimumab was administered as 40 mg biweekly subcutaneously. Concomitant drug treatment was monitored and continued at constant dosage during the study. All serum samples were tested for infliximab/adalimumab levels and anti-infliximab/anti-adalimumab antibodies.
35 patients received infliximab, 34 received adalimumab. At 6 months, 15 (43%), 6 (17%) and 14 (40%) of the infliximab-treated patients fulfilled the EULAR criteria for good, moderate and non-responders, respectively, whereas the corresponding figures for adalimumab-treated patients were 16 (47%), 8 (24%) and 10 (29%). Clinical responses correlated with the levels of S-infliximab/adalimumab and the formation of anti-infliximab/anti-adalimumab antibodies.
The clinical response to two anti-TNFalpha biological agents closely follows the trough drug levels and the presence of antibodies directed against the drugs. Further studies that focus on the underlying pathways leading to antibody formation are warranted to predict immunogenicity of these expensive biological agents and treatment outcomes.
肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)中和抗体构建体越来越多地用于治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)。
确定接受英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗的类风湿性关节炎患者在临床反应、可溶性药物水平和抗体形成方面的潜在差异。
连续纳入69例符合1987年美国风湿病学会标准且即将开始使用英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗治疗的类风湿性关节炎患者。所有患者均患有活动性疾病(28关节计数疾病活动评分>3.2)。英夫利昔单抗在基线时以及2、6和14周后静脉注射,剂量为3mg/kg。阿达木单抗每两周皮下注射40mg。监测联合药物治疗情况,并在研究期间以恒定剂量持续使用。检测所有血清样本中的英夫利昔单抗/阿达木单抗水平以及抗英夫利昔单抗/抗阿达木单抗抗体。
35例患者接受英夫利昔单抗治疗,34例接受阿达木单抗治疗。6个月时,接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者中,分别有15例(43%)、6例(17%)和14例(40%)达到欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)关于良好、中等和无反应者的标准,而接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者相应数字分别为16例(47%)、8例(24%)和10例(29%)。临床反应与S-英夫利昔单抗/阿达木单抗水平以及抗英夫利昔单抗/抗阿达木单抗抗体的形成相关。
对两种抗TNFα生物制剂的临床反应密切遵循药物谷浓度以及针对药物的抗体的存在情况。有必要进行进一步研究,聚焦导致抗体形成的潜在途径,以预测这些昂贵生物制剂的免疫原性和治疗结果。