Konstas A G P, Mikropoulos D, Haidich A-B, Ntampos K S, Stewart W C
PRN Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC, 5001 LBJ Freeway, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75244, USA.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;93(4):481-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.147322. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
To evaluate the 24 h efficacy and safety of the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) versus travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
Prospective, double-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomised 24 h comparison. After a 6 week medicine-free period, patients were randomised to either TTFC or travoprost for 8 weeks and were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 8 weeks. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, a 24 h pressure curve was performed.
Thirty-two patients completed the study. The TTFC group demonstrated a lower absolute intraocular pressure level (2.4 mm Hg) for the 24 h curve and at all time points, compared with travoprost (p</=0.047). The pressure reduction from untreated baseline was significantly different between treatments for all time points (p = 0.018). The mean 24 h pressure fluctuation was lower with TTFC (3.0 mm Hg) compared with travoprost (4.0 mm Hg, p = 0.001). No statistical difference existed between the two treatment groups for any adverse event (p>0.05).
This study suggests that when both drugs are dosed in the evening the TTFC provides improved intraocular pressure reduction, compared with travoprost, over the 24 h curve and for each individual time point in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
评估在原发性开角型青光眼患者中,晚上给药时曲伏前列素/马来酸噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂(TTFC)与曲伏前列素相比的24小时疗效和安全性。
前瞻性、双盲、交叉、活性对照、随机24小时比较研究。在为期6周的停药期后,患者被随机分为接受TTFC或曲伏前列素治疗8周,然后换用另一种治疗再进行8周。在洗脱期和治疗期结束时,进行24小时眼压曲线测定。
32例患者完成了研究。与曲伏前列素相比,TTFC组在24小时眼压曲线及所有时间点的绝对眼压水平更低(低2.4 mmHg)(p≤0.047)。在所有时间点,两种治疗之间从未治疗的基线水平降低的眼压有显著差异(p = 0.018)。与曲伏前列素(4.0 mmHg,p = 0.001)相比,TTFC组的平均24小时眼压波动更低(3.0 mmHg)。两组治疗在任何不良事件方面均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。
本研究表明,在原发性开角型青光眼患者中,当两种药物均在晚上给药时,与曲伏前列素相比,TTFC在24小时眼压曲线及每个时间点能更好地降低眼压。